1993
DOI: 10.1006/mvre.1993.1012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Reactivity of Cortical and Juxtamedullary Glomeruli to Adenosine-1 and Adenosine-2 Receptor Stimulation and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the presence of ANG II (10 Ϫ11 or 10 Ϫ14 M) did not affect adenosineinduced constriction, suggesting a lack of interaction between these agents in this preparation. Although we are unable to exclude the possibility of such an interaction in OMDVR, these results support those of Dietrich and Steinhausen who found cortical but not juxtamedullary dependence of A 1 receptor stimulation on the renin-angiotensin system in glomerular arterioles (25). In summary, our data indicate an ability for adenosine to modulate OMDVR vascular tone through both A 1 and A 2 receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the presence of ANG II (10 Ϫ11 or 10 Ϫ14 M) did not affect adenosineinduced constriction, suggesting a lack of interaction between these agents in this preparation. Although we are unable to exclude the possibility of such an interaction in OMDVR, these results support those of Dietrich and Steinhausen who found cortical but not juxtamedullary dependence of A 1 receptor stimulation on the renin-angiotensin system in glomerular arterioles (25). In summary, our data indicate an ability for adenosine to modulate OMDVR vascular tone through both A 1 and A 2 receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Those receptor subtypes mediate selective effects on the renal vasculature. Stimulation of the A 1 receptor produces afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction (11,12,24) and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (19) while A 2 receptor stimulation yields efferent and afferent arteriolar vasodilatation (24,25). In our hands, stimulation by adenosine or CGS-21680, an A 2 receptor agonist, consistently vasodilates ANG II-preconstricted OMDVR (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this experimental model adenosine induced a preglomerular constriction, when applied topically from the interstitial side, which was most prominent in the distal part of the afferent arterioles (64). With the use of adenosine agonists and antagonists with different receptor subtype specificity, the data supported the concept that activation of adenosine A 1 receptors leads to constriction mainly of afferent arterioles near the glomerulus, whereas adenosine A 2 receptor activation leads to dilation mainly of the postglomerular arteries (65,90,133). Another study in the isolated perfused hydronephrotic rat kidney preparation provided evidence for both adenosine-induced constriction and dilation of afferent arterioles, and these effects were dependent on activation of adenosine A 1 and A 2a /A 2b receptors, respectively (327).…”
Section: Adenosine Effects On Pre-and Postglomerular Arteriessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The vasoconstrictive action of exogenous and endogenous adenosine can be antagonized by angiotensin II receptor antagonists (64,207,249,320). Likewise, inhibitors of angiotensin I converting enzyme can block adenosine-induced renal vasoconstriction (65). The assumed interaction of angiotensin II and adenosine in preglomerular vessels was confirmed in dogs (106,107).…”
Section: Dietary Nacl Status and Renin-angiotensin Systemmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Huang et al found that adenosine generated by both ecto-5′-nucleotidase-dependent and -independent mechanisms participated in mediation of TGF in vivo [25]. We and others have shown that adenosine constricts the Af-Art and dilates the Ef-Art via activation of the A 1 and A 2 receptor, respectively [26][27][28][29]. In vitro, using an isolated double-perfused Ef-Art and distal tubule containing the macula densa, we have shown that decreasing adenosine formation by blocking 5′-nucleotidase inhibits Ef-Art TGF, while increasing adenosine formation by enhancing ATP hydrolysis augments Ef-Art TGF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%