2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential reactivity of α and β 2′-deoxyribonucleosides towards protonation and metalation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm independently the differential reactivity of the anomers towards protonation and to investigate the underlying reasons, density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6-311+G** level were performed using 1,2,4-triazole nucleoside 2 as an example. [52] The result of these calculations is in very good agreement with the experimental data [∆pK a = 0.16 vs. 0.21 (7)]. Interestingly, no significant differences in the charge distribution between sugar moiety and nucleobase were observed between the two anomers, ruling out different charge localizations as a reason for the different acidity.…”
Section: Acidity Constantssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To confirm independently the differential reactivity of the anomers towards protonation and to investigate the underlying reasons, density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6-311+G** level were performed using 1,2,4-triazole nucleoside 2 as an example. [52] The result of these calculations is in very good agreement with the experimental data [∆pK a = 0.16 vs. 0.21 (7)]. Interestingly, no significant differences in the charge distribution between sugar moiety and nucleobase were observed between the two anomers, ruling out different charge localizations as a reason for the different acidity.…”
Section: Acidity Constantssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Artificial nucleosides for metal-ion-mediated base pairs in DNA (R = 2Ј-deoxyribose). The nucleobases are a) imidazole 1; [49] b) 1,2,4-triazole 2; [49,51,52] c) tetrazole 3; [49,53] d) benzimidazole 4; [52] e) 1H-imidazo [4,5-b]pyridine 5; [52] f) 3H-imidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (1-deazapurine) 6; [48,52] g) 7-amino-3H-imidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (1-deazaadenine) 7; [50] h) 5-methyl-2,2Ј-bipyridine 8; [54,66,67] i) 2,2Ј-bipyridine; [68] j) 4-(pyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-one; [69] k) ophenylenediamine; [41] l) catechol; [55] m) 2-aminophenol; [56] n) pyridine; [57,[61][62][63][64]71,72] o) 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4-pyridone; [58][59][60] p) R = OH: pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid; [61,62] R = NH 2 : pyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide; [64] R = NHCH 3 : N,NЈ-dimethylpyridine-2,6-dicarboxamide; [64] q) 2,6-bis(methylsulfanylmethyl)pyridine; [63] r) 8-hydroxyquinoline; [65] s) 6-(pyridin-2-yl)purine; [70] t) salicylaldehyde; [60,[73][74][75] u) 4-(2,2Ј-bipyridin-6-yl)pyrimidin-2-one; …”
Section: Metal-ion-mediated Base Pairs With Artificial Nucleosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…g ) In analogy to Entry 4, based on the pK a value of H(dRibBzIm) þ as determined by 1 H-NMR spectroscopy at natural ionic strength (4.21 AE 0.03) [32], the same value is estimated to amount to 4.29 AE 0.06 at I ¼ 0.1m.…”
Section: (Oh)mentioning
confidence: 99%