1984
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.93.4.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential recall as a function of mood disorder in clinically depressed patients: Between- and within-subject differences.

Abstract: Study 1 compared the short-term recall of tngrams that had been rated as liked or disliked by 23 elderly (age > 60) outpatients diagnosed as major depressive; 23 matched, normal elderly individuals; and 23 younger control subjects As we hypothesized, the depressed patients recalled more tngrams that they rated as disliked than tngrams they rated as liked. Both normal groups had the opposite pattern, but younger control subjects recalled significantly more liked tngrams than did older subjects Study 2 measured … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, nondepressed psychiatric controls manifesting moderate levels of depressed mood recall more depressed content words than do nondepressed normals (Derry & Kuiper, 1981). Clark and Teasdale (1982), Fogarty and Hemsley (1983), Lloyd and Lishman (1975), Slife et al (1984), Fogarty (1979), andWeingartner et al (1977) directly demonstrated the relation between memory and mood state, showing that memories congruent with mood state are more easily recalled than those that are incongruent. It is therefore logical to assume that mood state would operate in a like manner within a recall paradigm that uses words with affective (mood) content, such as that used by Derry and Kuiper (1981).…”
Section: Mood State and Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, nondepressed psychiatric controls manifesting moderate levels of depressed mood recall more depressed content words than do nondepressed normals (Derry & Kuiper, 1981). Clark and Teasdale (1982), Fogarty and Hemsley (1983), Lloyd and Lishman (1975), Slife et al (1984), Fogarty (1979), andWeingartner et al (1977) directly demonstrated the relation between memory and mood state, showing that memories congruent with mood state are more easily recalled than those that are incongruent. It is therefore logical to assume that mood state would operate in a like manner within a recall paradigm that uses words with affective (mood) content, such as that used by Derry and Kuiper (1981).…”
Section: Mood State and Memorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recovered depressed participants (who were no longer in a depressed mood state) did not differ from normal controls in their recall of negative words. Hammen et al (1986) and Slife, Miura, Thompson, Shapiro, and Gallagher (1984) gave depressed and nondepressed individuals recall tests at two different time points, once prior to treatment and once following treatment. In both studies depressed participants showed trait-congruent recall of negative cues on the first testing occasion; the nondepressed controls did not show this effect.…”
Section: Evidence For Personality X Mood Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the influence of the self-concept on selective social information seeking was also noted by Swann, Krull, and Pelham (1987), who showed that low self-esteem, but not temporarily induced dysphoric mood, led to a preference for questions that probed for negative feedback about self. On the other hand, however, some studies (Clark & Teasdale, 1982;Slife, Miura, Thompson, & Shapiro, 1984) (1987), who concluded from their literature review that "mood, independent of diagnosis, may be considered to act as a switching device that activates or deactivates schemata" (p. 37).…”
Section: Stage Vi: Selective Perception and Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%