Glycine, aspargine, and glutamine inhibited the induction by nitrate of nitrate reductase activity in root tips of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). This inhibition was partially or entirely prevented wben the inhibitor was applied in combination with any of several other amino adds. Studies of 14C-labeled amino acid uptake showed that, in most cases, the apparent antagonism resulted simply from competition for uptake. However, certain antagonists did not curtail uptake. The most effective of these were leucine (against all three inhibitors), and isoleucine and valine (against asparagine or glutamine, but not glycine). These results show that interactions among amino acids in the regulation of nitrate reductase inductioi result from at least two mechanisms, one acting on uptake of inhibitory amino acids, and the other involving true antagonism.In many higher and lower plants, amino acids can block nitrate assimilation at either the nitrate uptake step, or the initial nitrate reduction step, or both (1, 5, 7-10, 12-15, 17). This phenomenon is generally considered to be an example of end product repression (5, 17) because all reduced N arises from this pathway in nitrate-grown plants. However, another aspect of this regulation deserves attention. Inhibition of NR' induction by single amino acids can apparently be prevented by other amino acids (1, 5). Several explanations are possible for such antagonistic behavior, ranging from derepression to competition in amino acid uptake (2,6). In tobacco cell cultures, the most thoroughly studied higher plant system, threonine prevented independently the absorption of nitrate and the development of NR activity (8), but arginine reversed this inhibition without affecting threonine uptake (7). The phenomenon thus appears to be true antagonism rather than uptake competition. What advantage is conferred upon plants by antagonism of inhibition, when the antagonists are themselves end products of the same pathway?I reported earlier (15) that induction of NR activity in cotton root tips was inhibited by certain amino acids applied alone. The inhibitors appeared to act on induction rather than on nitrate uptake. This paper extends to act on induction rather than on nitrate uptake. This paper extends those observations to include the effects of mixtures of inhibitory and noninhibitory amino acids. Some of these data were reported in preliminary form (16).
MATERIALS AND METHODSInduction of NR Activity. Procedures were similar to those described earlier (15). Seeds of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.