2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00314-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential requirements for CTL generation by novel immunostimulants: APC tropism, use of the TAP-independent processing pathway, and dependency on CD80/CD86 costimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation, what seems to influence which pathway is operative is the physical form of the antigen: iron oxide or polystyrene versus PLGA particles. In another example, presentation of OVA formulated differently can be either TAP‐dependent or ‐independent (115). One possible explanation for this difference is suggested by the observation that after internalization, different kinds of particles localize to different vacuoles (116–119).…”
Section: The Vacuolar Pathway Of Cross‐presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, what seems to influence which pathway is operative is the physical form of the antigen: iron oxide or polystyrene versus PLGA particles. In another example, presentation of OVA formulated differently can be either TAP‐dependent or ‐independent (115). One possible explanation for this difference is suggested by the observation that after internalization, different kinds of particles localize to different vacuoles (116–119).…”
Section: The Vacuolar Pathway Of Cross‐presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To formulate the protein vaccine for the present research, purified and endotoxin depleted rGRA1 protein was adjuvanted to Provax, which is known to be a strong inducer of Th1 cytokine and antigen-specific CD8 lymphocyte production. Indeed, Provax is prepared by mixing previously known strong adjuvants squalane and pluronic L121 to Tween-80 [32,33,64]. Adjuvants have been reported to increase the immunogenicity of protein vaccines [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…highlight the complexity of the immune response and the unpredictable relationships among various parameters such as vaccine strategy to be used against toxoplasmosis, protection and cellular immune response elicited by recombinant protein vaccine or parasite strain used to challenge the mice. In order to comprehensively evaluate these variables, the present study compares cellular immune response and protection potency of a recombinant GRA1 protein vaccine adjuvanted with a strong Th1 inducer Provax [32,33], a wild type GRA1 DNA vaccine and a GRA1 DNA vaccine codon-optimized for protein expression in mammalian cells. Codon usage optimization is widely accepted as a means of increasing the level of in vivo antigen expression from DNA vaccines and improving the cellular and humoral immune responses against the expressed antigens from diverse microorganisms [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%