2014
DOI: 10.1111/een.12142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential response of Trichogramma wasps to extreme sex pheromone types of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens

Abstract: 1. Chemical espionage in nature may occur when predators or parasitoids home in on animal or plant communication signals. Parasitoid wasps are known to use pheromones emitted by adults hosts to locate host eggs, larvae or pupae. The response of Trichogramma egg parasitoids to a synthetic sex pheromone blend of moths has been shown in a number of studies over the past 40 years.2. Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) is a tiny parasitic wasp, attacking the eggs of the noctuid moth Heliothis vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the sexual communication system of C. pomonella is not stable but subject to variation. Within-species and even within-population variation in the sex pheromone blend has been shown in some other moth species as well [ 51 , 68 , 87 , 88 ], suggesting that stabilizing selection may be countered by natural selection, e.g., due to the homing in of natural enemies [ 89 ], or due to communication interference with other closely related sympatrically occurring species [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 ], or due to mating disruption. The general assumption that moth sex pheromones have very low variation because of their importance as species-recognition signals has likely inhibited studies on the extent of intraspecific variation in moth sex pheromone signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the sexual communication system of C. pomonella is not stable but subject to variation. Within-species and even within-population variation in the sex pheromone blend has been shown in some other moth species as well [ 51 , 68 , 87 , 88 ], suggesting that stabilizing selection may be countered by natural selection, e.g., due to the homing in of natural enemies [ 89 ], or due to communication interference with other closely related sympatrically occurring species [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 ], or due to mating disruption. The general assumption that moth sex pheromones have very low variation because of their importance as species-recognition signals has likely inhibited studies on the extent of intraspecific variation in moth sex pheromone signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The female's direct investment in reproduction starts by attracting males through 'calling', i.e., extruding her sex pheromone gland and emitting a long-range pheromone. This may result in fitness and physiological costs [48,49] and may make her vulnerable to parasitism and predation [50,51].…”
Section: ] Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The female's direct investment in reproduction starts by attracting males through 'calling', i.e., extruding her sex pheromone gland and emitting a long-range pheromone. This may result in fitness and physiological costs [48,49] and may make her vulnerable to parasitism and predation [50,51]. Mate choice experiments indicate that females do not discriminate between virgin or mated males [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%