2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Response to a Dysphoric Mood Induction Procedure as a Function of Level of Experiential Avoidance

Abstract: Participants reporting high versus low levels of experiential avoidance as assessed by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (Hayes et al., 2004)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, those with lower EA accept and de-emphasize pain associated with stress (Costa & Pinto-Gouveia, 2011). Along those lines, studies using lab-based stressors report that high (relative to low) EA predicts more negative emotional responses after either unpleasant film clips (Shallcross, Troy, Boland, & Mauss, 2010;Sloan, 2004), inhalation of carbon dioxide-enriched air (which induces breathlessness and other physiological symptoms ;Feldner, Zvolensky, Eifert, & Spira, 2003), or dysphoric mood induction (the Velten Mood Induction Procedure [Velten, 1968] accompanied by music; Gird & Zettle, 2009). That noted, studies that instructed participants to use acceptance versus other emotion regulation strategies (e.g., suppression) in the face of discomfort have found mixed results and overall no advantage for acceptance in minimizing negative affect (for a review, see Kohl, Rief, & Glombiewski, 2012); dispositional EA was not considered in the review.…”
Section: Experiential Avoidance (Ea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, those with lower EA accept and de-emphasize pain associated with stress (Costa & Pinto-Gouveia, 2011). Along those lines, studies using lab-based stressors report that high (relative to low) EA predicts more negative emotional responses after either unpleasant film clips (Shallcross, Troy, Boland, & Mauss, 2010;Sloan, 2004), inhalation of carbon dioxide-enriched air (which induces breathlessness and other physiological symptoms ;Feldner, Zvolensky, Eifert, & Spira, 2003), or dysphoric mood induction (the Velten Mood Induction Procedure [Velten, 1968] accompanied by music; Gird & Zettle, 2009). That noted, studies that instructed participants to use acceptance versus other emotion regulation strategies (e.g., suppression) in the face of discomfort have found mixed results and overall no advantage for acceptance in minimizing negative affect (for a review, see Kohl, Rief, & Glombiewski, 2012); dispositional EA was not considered in the review.…”
Section: Experiential Avoidance (Ea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary purpose in conducting this project was to identify audiovisual presentations that reliably induce amusement in the laboratory among college students who continue to serve as a convenience sample within our broader research program on emotion regulation (e.g., Gird & Zettle, 2009; Swails et al., 2016). For understandable reasons, emotion regulation, particularly within research and practice of clinical psychology, historically has focused primarily on the management and alleviation of negative affective states such as fear, sorrow, and anger (Tugade & Fredrickson, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in research involving acceptance-based approaches such as ACT and was included because how participants respond to and cope with distressing challenges been found to be related to levels of experiential avoidance. More specifically, participants high in experiential avoidance have typically reported more negative psychological reactions to challenges, such as the cold pressor, and less willingness to tolerate them (e.g., gird & Zettle, 2009;Zettle et al, 2005;Zettle, Petersen, Hocker, & Provines, 2007). Including the AAQ made it possible to rule out any treatment condition effects that could be attributed to differential levels of experiential avoidance among participants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%