2003
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.10129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential risks to males and females for congenital malformations among 2.5 million California births, 1989–1997

Abstract: Our observations extend the relatively few studies that have investigated differential prevalences of a large number of specific structural malformations between male and female births.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
62
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
62
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking to literature there are several studies 9,10 that show no statistically signifi cant gender predilection, whereas several other large studies that concur with our fi ndings 20,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Looking to literature there are several studies 9,10 that show no statistically signifi cant gender predilection, whereas several other large studies that concur with our fi ndings 20,21 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Many defects have deviations in the ratio of affected males versus affected females, 30 and there are differences in the sex ratios by ethnicity for infants with cleft lip, 31 but no explanations for these deviations have been forthcoming. It is possible that the racial/ethnic differences we observed may be the result of differential loss of CHD-affected pregnancies during the gestational period rather than true differences in the incidence of CHD.…”
Section: Original Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluding such random variation or publication bias can be difficult, unless large systematic surveys are carried out amongst a wide geographic, ethnic, and temporal spectrum. One such survey was recently reported from a large, population-based study in California [Shaw et al, 2003]. Studies such as these are valuable but though large, represent the experience of a single region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, among children with certain heart defects such as transposition of the great arteries and hypoplastic left heart [Botto et al, 2001;Pradat et al, 2003;Shaw et al, 2003] the male excess is even higher than in the general newborn population, with up to two out of three cases being male. Conversely for spina bifida and particularly anencephaly, affected babies show a female rather than a male excess [Bamforth and Baird, 1989;Kä llén et al, 1994].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%