Like every natural phenomenon in the world, psychological phenomena take on mechanisms that give rise to them. Without exception, confirmation bias emerges from mechanisms that increase the chances for a person to assert information complacently once a certain threshold is met. The literature on confirmation bias (CB) points to several social, cognitive, and emotional factors in facilitating CB, and more recent work illustrates the neural correlates to some of these factors. However, what is missing in the science on CB are investigations into more "basic" factors that may lead to CB and constitute the more basic "ingredients" that support and evoke the human mind. The author argues that at least three fundamental factors are uncertainty, valence, and working memory. With these factors in mind, the author summarizes behavioral and neurobiological correlates of CB, mechanisms associated with these behavioral and brain manifestations of CB, and gaps in the literature where a focus on studying uncertainty, valence, and working memory may prove instructive. The author further argues these factors may explain current findings in CB and proposes a model wherein these factors interact mechanistically to give rise to CB.