2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2021.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential roles of interferons in innate responses to mucosal viral infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, the different susceptibility of EIV/63 and EIV/2003 to the type I IFN response ( Fig 1D ) together with the distinct transcriptional changes induced by each virus on interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) ( Fig 4A and B ) indicate that H3N8 EIV adaptation led to a more efficient escape to host pathogen recognition, as well as a more regulated control of the innate immune response. This is particularly important when considering that the innate immune response is the first line of defence against infections as it has direct antiviral effects [ 56 ], modulates downstream immune responses [ 57 ], and possesses proinflammatory properties [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the different susceptibility of EIV/63 and EIV/2003 to the type I IFN response ( Fig 1D ) together with the distinct transcriptional changes induced by each virus on interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) ( Fig 4A and B ) indicate that H3N8 EIV adaptation led to a more efficient escape to host pathogen recognition, as well as a more regulated control of the innate immune response. This is particularly important when considering that the innate immune response is the first line of defence against infections as it has direct antiviral effects [ 56 ], modulates downstream immune responses [ 57 ], and possesses proinflammatory properties [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to IFN-γ, the type-I IFN, IFN-α, is also a strong inducer of antiviral ISGs [ 49 , 60 , 66 , 75 ] and uncontrolled IFN-α responses have been associated with increased pathogenesis [ 51 , 52 , 70 , 71 ]. This study examined whether the kinetics of ISG responses to IFN-α treatment differed from that by IFN-γ in PBMCs ( Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFN signaling pathway protects cells from invading viral pathogens by trans-activating a variety of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Some ISGs encode innate detectors of viral molecules, while some encode effectors with varied antiviral functions, such as regulators of the apoptotic pathway, and IFN-signaling molecules [ 45 , 48 , 49 ]. Our studies and others suggest that a “fine-tuned” ISG response is critical for suppressing undesired, exaggerated viral responses, including HIV, that induce prolonged immune activation, and for preventing the consequential pathogenic host damages, while maintaining some innate antiviral activity [ 41 , 43 , 44 , 46 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that either the increased viral load resulting from productive infection or the replication process per se, are endowed with immunostimulatory abilities, even in absence of type I IFN signaling. It should be noted that mice devoid of IFNARmediated signaling still express the ligands and receptors for type II (IFN-γ) and type III IFNs (IFN-λs), which may be prominently involved in the response to a viral challenge by immune or epithelial cell subsets, respectively [38,39]. The presence, functionality, and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2-originated stimuli of the complementary IFN signaling systems in the IFNAR −/− may form the molecular basis for the here-observed alterations in gene expression patterns upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and/or upon its replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%