2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m802617200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Roles of Phosphatidylserine, PtdIns(4,5)P2, and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 in Plasma Membrane Targeting of C2 Domains

Abstract: Many cytosolic proteins are recruited to the plasma membrane (PM) during cell signaling and other cellular processes. Recent reports have indicated that phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P 2 ), and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 ) that are present in the PM play important roles for their specific PM recruitment. To systematically analyze how these lipids mediate PM targeting of cellular proteins, we performed biophysical, computational, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This orientation would be similar to the one found in the crystal structure presented here and thus would be compatible with a perfect docking of the C2 domain in the membrane interface being PtdIns(4,5)P 2 , the target molecule. Furthermore, this orientation would also explain the biochemical results showing that PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 can also bind (although with lower affinity) to this C2 domain (10,20,28), because the phosphate group in the C3 of the inositol ring would point to the membrane interface not being directly involved in the protein interaction (see Fig. 1C and the docking model proposed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This orientation would be similar to the one found in the crystal structure presented here and thus would be compatible with a perfect docking of the C2 domain in the membrane interface being PtdIns(4,5)P 2 , the target molecule. Furthermore, this orientation would also explain the biochemical results showing that PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 can also bind (although with lower affinity) to this C2 domain (10,20,28), because the phosphate group in the C3 of the inositol ring would point to the membrane interface not being directly involved in the protein interaction (see Fig. 1C and the docking model proposed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, the PT domain can weakly bind to the plasma membrane in the absence of receptor ligation by detecting a set of constitutively present phosphoinositides, composed of PI(4,5)P 2 plus low levels of PI(3,4)P 2 and PI(3,4,5)P 3 . Basic/hydrophobic clusters in Rit, Rin, and PKC␣ are similarly targeted to the plasma membrane by PI(4,5)P 2 in combination with PI(3,4)P 2 and/or PI(3,4,5)P 3 (30,69). Given the large excess of PI(4,5)P 2 over PI(3,4,5)P 3 plus (PI(3,4)P 2 in cells, it is surprising that PI(4,5)P 2 does not completely dictate the localization of basic hydrophobic clusters due to their broad specificities for phosphoinositides, but it is possible that the ratio of PI(4,5)P 2 to PI(3,4,5)P 2 plus PI(3,4)P 2 available for BHC binding at the plasma membrane is lower than whole cell quantities would suggest, perhaps due to selective sequestration of PI(4,5)P 2 (70,71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the presence of PS in the liposomes used for surface plasmon resonance was required for binding of the KCNQ1 fusion proteins and without PS no binding of the full-length KCNQ1 was possible. PS has previously been shown to be required for the membrane recruitment of the C2 domain of PKC␣ (53). PIP 2 and PtdIns(3,4,5)P 3 make up only a fraction of the negative charge in the membrane and PS is a predominantly negatively charged lipid that has been shown to be involved in recruiting proteins to this location (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%