2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential search algorithm for solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The setting of optimal control variables of IKHA are presented in Table 3, which shows that the minimum of fuel cost emission obtained by IKHA is 0.204818 ton/h. The simulation result is compared with other methods in Table 7, and better than KHA, differential search algorithm (DSA) [9] ABC [31], MSA [22], MGBICA [32] and MSLFA [30]. Compared with the above cases, this objective function is non-linear.…”
Section: Case 3: Minimization Of Fuel Cost Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The setting of optimal control variables of IKHA are presented in Table 3, which shows that the minimum of fuel cost emission obtained by IKHA is 0.204818 ton/h. The simulation result is compared with other methods in Table 7, and better than KHA, differential search algorithm (DSA) [9] ABC [31], MSA [22], MGBICA [32] and MSLFA [30]. Compared with the above cases, this objective function is non-linear.…”
Section: Case 3: Minimization Of Fuel Cost Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to a certain extent, the traditional methods cannot solve the OPF problem successfully. With the development of computers, the intelligent optimization methods based on the combination of computer technology and biological simulation are proposed to overcome many drawbacks of the traditional methods; and these heuristic algorithms include artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC) [7], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [8], differential search algorithm (DSA) [9], differential evolution algorithm (DE) [10], gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [11], etc. Numerous studies indicate that each algorithm has different performance, pros and cons in different cases, so there are more and more modified methods based on intelligent algorithms to solve the OPF problem effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2014, Ghasemi et al [35] presented chaotic invasive weed optimization (CIWO) algorithms based on chaos and examine its performance for optimal settings of OPF and its control variables. In 2016, Abaci and Yamacli [36] presented a differential search based optimization method to solve various types of problems including complex, single, and multiobjective functions within the constraints concerning optimal power flow (OPF). In 2016, Acharjee [37] presented the self-adaptive differential evolutionary (SADE) algorithm for increasing and controlling the power flow using unified power flow controller (UPFC) under practical security constraints (SCs).…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its principle is simple and it is easy to be understood and implemented with fewer controlled parameters. DE has been used to solve different engineering optimization problems and achieved good effects [17][18][19][20]. However, the control parameters in DE have a great effect on the algorithm performance and their appropriate values must be obtained through numerous tests.…”
Section: Optimization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%