2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13238-011-1020-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential signaling of Flt3 activating mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a working model

Abstract: Receptor tyrosine kinases couple a wide variety of extracellular cues to cellular responses. The class III subfamily comprises the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, c-Kit, Flt3 and c-Fms, all of which relay cell proliferation signals upon ligand binding. Accordingly, mutations in these proteins that confer ligand-independent activation are found in a subset of cancers. These mutations cluster in the juxtamembrane (JM) and catalytic tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) regions. In the case of acute myeloid leuke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the altered juxtamemebrane domain (JM) domain of the FLT3/ITD mutant destabilizes the autoinhibited kinase conformation of FLT3, resulting in a high level of autophosphorylation of the receptor and its subsequent retention in the perinuclear region with prolonged exposure to perinuclear substrates such as STAT5. In contrast, the normal JM domain of FLT3/KD mutants is more efficiently processed and trafficked to the plasma membrane, and thus would activate downstream signals more similar to those of wild-type FLT3 (33). Consistent with this, we observed significantly higher levels of STAT5 phosphorylation, as well as increased expression of STAT5 downstream targets, in the BM of FLT3/ITD mice compared with FLT3/D835Y mice, supporting the idea that the two mutations have at least this one difference in the activation of downstream pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed that the altered juxtamemebrane domain (JM) domain of the FLT3/ITD mutant destabilizes the autoinhibited kinase conformation of FLT3, resulting in a high level of autophosphorylation of the receptor and its subsequent retention in the perinuclear region with prolonged exposure to perinuclear substrates such as STAT5. In contrast, the normal JM domain of FLT3/KD mutants is more efficiently processed and trafficked to the plasma membrane, and thus would activate downstream signals more similar to those of wild-type FLT3 (33). Consistent with this, we observed significantly higher levels of STAT5 phosphorylation, as well as increased expression of STAT5 downstream targets, in the BM of FLT3/ITD mice compared with FLT3/D835Y mice, supporting the idea that the two mutations have at least this one difference in the activation of downstream pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that, unlike the deficits in HSCs from FLT3/ITD mice, the HSC compartment in FLT3/D835Y mice appears less affected, with KSL SLAM populations and functional engraftment capacity closer to that of wild-type mice. (18,33). This lack of STAT5 activation has also been proposed to be one of the differences in signaling between FLT3/ITD and FLT3/KD mutants.…”
Section: Cd19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, prerequisite of the intracellular retention is the constitutive activity of the receptor mediating slowdown of its post‐translational biogenesis . In an “intracellular active kinase load” model Chan suggested that recruitment of phosphotyrosine‐binding domain‐containing proteins causes the retardation, but the molecular mechanism of FLT3 ITD retention in intracellular compartments is currently still not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] FLT3 is expressed on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells where it functions in cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival. After translation, FLT3 undergoes glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum to form an immature receptor and progresses to the Golgi complex where final glycosylation produces a mature receptor before it translocates to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%