1985
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198509000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Spread of Blockade of Touch, Cold, and Pinprick during Spinal Anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found a significant correlation of block heights between modalities suggesting that all provide potentially useful information about block height albeit at different levels. We found a wide variation in the assessments of block height between modalities and as previously reported [9]; these were lower for touch than for cold or pinprick, which in turn were lower than that measured as icy without change from the reference point (Table 1). More than three quarters of the women in our study failed to have a block to touch that reached T6 at the time anaesthesia was thought to be adequate to commence surgery, and of these, only five (5%) required an additional pharmacological intervention ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have found a significant correlation of block heights between modalities suggesting that all provide potentially useful information about block height albeit at different levels. We found a wide variation in the assessments of block height between modalities and as previously reported [9]; these were lower for touch than for cold or pinprick, which in turn were lower than that measured as icy without change from the reference point (Table 1). More than three quarters of the women in our study failed to have a block to touch that reached T6 at the time anaesthesia was thought to be adequate to commence surgery, and of these, only five (5%) required an additional pharmacological intervention ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the reliance on touch alone could lead to unnecessarily increasing the dose of local anaesthetic injected during spinal anaesthesia, delaying the start of caesarean section, or even abandoning perfectly adequate anaesthesia [7]. Modalities available to assess block height include the Neurotip TM (Owen Mumford, Oxford, UK), ethyl chloride spray and light pressure with a finger to assess touch; an 18-G needle to assess pinprick; and ethyl chloride spray, alcohol swab and ice to assess temperature [5,[8][9][10]. There are problems with some of these methods of assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spinal anaesthesia, the loss of sensation to touch is slower in onset and regresses more rapidly than the loss of sensation to pinprick, this may be due to differential block of different nerve fiber types and that differential block is greater during regression of anesthesia which occurs at the end of the surgery [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diferansiyel duyusal sinir bloğu A-ß, A-δ ve C lifl erinin farklı derecelerde bloke olmasıyla ortaya çıkar 5,6 . Spinal anestezi sonrasında duyusal blok seviyesinin belirlenmesinde pinprick ve soğuk uygulama sık kullanılan yöntemlerdir ve bunlardan pinprick uygulaması A-δ ve soğuk uygulaması C lifl erinin etkilendiğini gösterir.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified