1985
DOI: 10.1159/000124081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Suppression of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in vivo by a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist

Abstract: Because of some indication that FSH secretion is less dependent than LH secretion on GnRH in vivo, we performed experiments to examine the effects of a GnRH antagonist (antag) on LH and FSH secretion. We first showed that pituitary cells superfused with GnRH showed a similar pattern of suppressed secretion of both LH and FSH in response to addition of antag. In contrast, antag administration to ovariectomized rats had differing effects on LH and FSH secretion. Serum LH was suppressed in a dose-dependent fashio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
19
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations support the contention that FSH secretion may be less dependent on GnRH than LH, utilizing evidence that GnRH antagonists in vivo lower serum LH more than FSH, whether given to gonadectomized rats or intact rats at metestrus and proestrus [23,24]. In dispersed cell cultures the effect of Antag on LH and FSH is equal when given against a back ground of GnRH stimulation [8], but others have seen discre pancies using pituitary fragments [10], A GnRH antagonist si milar to the one used in the present experiments causes a drop in bioassayable FSH when given to male patients [25], while immunoassayable FSH shows the minor drop we have seen in rats [8,23]. Since we did not measure bioassayable FSH we do not know whether the differences in FSH:LH ratios seen in this study as a function of Antag are partly due to failure of the RIA to pick up changes in bioactive FSH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observations support the contention that FSH secretion may be less dependent on GnRH than LH, utilizing evidence that GnRH antagonists in vivo lower serum LH more than FSH, whether given to gonadectomized rats or intact rats at metestrus and proestrus [23,24]. In dispersed cell cultures the effect of Antag on LH and FSH is equal when given against a back ground of GnRH stimulation [8], but others have seen discre pancies using pituitary fragments [10], A GnRH antagonist si milar to the one used in the present experiments causes a drop in bioassayable FSH when given to male patients [25], while immunoassayable FSH shows the minor drop we have seen in rats [8,23]. Since we did not measure bioassayable FSH we do not know whether the differences in FSH:LH ratios seen in this study as a function of Antag are partly due to failure of the RIA to pick up changes in bioactive FSH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Not only was a paradoxical suppression of BSR caused by the Antag, but the suppressive effect was more marked for LH se cretion rates than FSH, and more effective in pituitaries from proestrous rats than from metestrous animals. These results ob tained with perifused pituitary fragments are discussed in light of previous reports [8][9][10] of suppression by such antagonists in dispersed pituitary cell cultures and after in vivo administration. Implications for regulation of gonadotropin secretion during the estrous cycle are also considered.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The FSH response to GnRH suppression in vivo is known to be more sluggish than the LH response. Thus, Grady et al (20) did not observe any changes in FSH levels until 12 h after suppression by a GnRH antagonist, whereas LH levels showed a dose-dependant 20 -50% decrease by 2 h. As our clamp lasted for 6 h, glycemiainduced suppression of GnRH could well be responsible for the selective decrease in LH concentration, leaving FSH levels unaffected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Antagonists of LH-RH have been originally developed for contraception [1][2][3][4][5][26][27][28][29][30]. Other uses, such as treatment of endometriosis and cancer therapy were later proposed [ 1,3,4,26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%