1984
DOI: 10.1159/000123891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Suppression of FSH and LH Secretion by Follicular Fluid in the Presence or Absence of GnRH

Abstract: The differential role of porcine follicular fluid (pFF) in regulating follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) release in vivo in situations of different gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) backgrounds was studied. In experiment 1, 2-week ovariectomized rats injected intravenously with 4, 16 or 64 mg of protein from pFF, showed a dose-dependent suppression of FSH over time, with a maximal suppression to 40% of control values by 10 h. LH levels were slightly, but significantly, elevated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Judging from the LH concentrations found at 5 and 8 h after unilateral or bilateral ovariec¬ tomy performed at various ages, which, with the excep¬ tion of results at 28 days of age, showed no changes compared with control rats, it seems justified to conclude that ILA plays a specific role in the regulation of FSH secretion only, in agreement with the results of others (e.g. Charlesworth, Grady, Shin et al 1984). The differences in LH concentrations seen at 28 days of age between some experimental and control groups are most easily explained by the high variability in LH levels generally found, as clearly illustrated by the LH concentrations in control groups at this age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Judging from the LH concentrations found at 5 and 8 h after unilateral or bilateral ovariec¬ tomy performed at various ages, which, with the excep¬ tion of results at 28 days of age, showed no changes compared with control rats, it seems justified to conclude that ILA plays a specific role in the regulation of FSH secretion only, in agreement with the results of others (e.g. Charlesworth, Grady, Shin et al 1984). The differences in LH concentrations seen at 28 days of age between some experimental and control groups are most easily explained by the high variability in LH levels generally found, as clearly illustrated by the LH concentrations in control groups at this age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These observations support the contention that FSH secretion may be less dependent on GnRH than LH, utilizing evidence that GnRH antagonists in vivo lower serum LH more than FSH, whether given to gonadectomized rats or intact rats at metestrus and proestrus [23,24]. In dispersed cell cultures the effect of Antag on LH and FSH is equal when given against a back ground of GnRH stimulation [8], but others have seen discre pancies using pituitary fragments [10], A GnRH antagonist si milar to the one used in the present experiments causes a drop in bioassayable FSH when given to male patients [25], while immunoassayable FSH shows the minor drop we have seen in rats [8,23]. Since we did not measure bioassayable FSH we do not know whether the differences in FSH:LH ratios seen in this study as a function of Antag are partly due to failure of the RIA to pick up changes in bioactive FSH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The variable patterns of the LH responses to oFF (1 sheep showed an increased amplitude) indicate the fickle nature of the LH secretory mechanisms with regard to follicular fluid proteins. Similarly inconsistent results have been achieved in rats by Charlesworth et al (1984), who explained their results in terms of varying backgrounds of GnRH stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%