2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2006.00078.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential Threshold and Psychophysical Power Function of Sweetness Sensation: Applied Psychophysics and Prospect Theory on Formulating Baking Products

Abstract: The main purpose of this project was to develop the optimal sweetness sensation framework for baking products. Phase 1 was designed to measure consumers' differential thresholds of sweetness sensation when the sweetener contents of various sweetener‐leveled products were increased and lowered by using the constant stimuli method. Results indicated that the consumers' differential thresholds increased when the initial sweetener levels of products increased. Phase 2 was designed to establish the psychophysical p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average difference threshold for adults corresponded to 6.21% of the added sugar content of the grape nectar. This result is in agreement with the values reported by other authors in different food matrices: 8.5% in orange nectar (Pineli et al, ), 6.7% in chocolate‐flavored milk (Oliveira et al, ), 6.7–7.0% for dairy‐based emulsions, and 5.7–6.2% for sucrose solutions (Hoppert, Zahn, Puschmann, Ullmann, & Rohm, ), 7.0–11.0% for pound cakes (Chang & Chiou, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The average difference threshold for adults corresponded to 6.21% of the added sugar content of the grape nectar. This result is in agreement with the values reported by other authors in different food matrices: 8.5% in orange nectar (Pineli et al, ), 6.7% in chocolate‐flavored milk (Oliveira et al, ), 6.7–7.0% for dairy‐based emulsions, and 5.7–6.2% for sucrose solutions (Hoppert, Zahn, Puschmann, Ullmann, & Rohm, ), 7.0–11.0% for pound cakes (Chang & Chiou, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The baseline sweetener content (or baker's content) was set as 100%; this was the standard sweetener condition against which other levels were compared. Sweetener content in the comparison set was varied according to a preliminary study that measured the consumers' differential thresholds for changes in sweetener content (see Chang and Chiou 2006 for details). The comparison stimulus set consisted of 12 sweetener content adjustments in the stimulus food, pound cake.…”
Section: Participants and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12 sweetener levels, separated by a change of 2.5% in sweetener content, were as follows: -15.0, -12,5, -10.0, -7.5, -5.0, -2.5, +2.5, +5.0, +7.5, +10.0, +12.5 and +15.0%. Chang and Chiou (2006) measured the consumers' differential thresholds for sweetness with differing levels of sweetener and found no significant difference in differential thresholds between situations in which sweetener was reduced and those in which it was increased. Hence, calculations of differential thresholds in the current study combined data from trials involving sweetener increase and reduction.…”
Section: Participants and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JND is the minimal difference that can be detected between 2 stimuli (Lawless and Heymann 1999). JNDs are important, for example, when a negative change, such as the reduction in an expensive ingredient in a formula is not readily discernible to consumers (below JND), or when a positive change, such as an increment in the amount of a consumers’ favorable ingredient, is very apparent to consumers (above JND; Chang and Chiou 2006). Research on pungent food products have been conducted to study the interaction of chili peppers with other food ingredients such as cheese sauces, chicken patties, pork patties, sucrose, sodium chloride, and citric acid, among others (Sizer and Harris 1985; Carden and others 1999; Emrick and others 2005; Reinbach and others 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%