2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential time courses and specificity of amygdala activity in posttraumatic stress disorder subjects and normal control subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
161
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
9
161
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, there is no explanation as to why these FKBP5 effects were lateralized, as findings of lateralization of amygdala activation and volume remain inconclusive. For example, PTSD patients were found to show more pronounced hyperactivity in the left than in the right amygdala when confronted with trauma-related words (Protopopescu et al 2005) or masked fearful faces (Rauch et al 2000). However, this lateralized effect was not confirmed in a meta-analysis (Etkin and Wager 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So far, there is no explanation as to why these FKBP5 effects were lateralized, as findings of lateralization of amygdala activation and volume remain inconclusive. For example, PTSD patients were found to show more pronounced hyperactivity in the left than in the right amygdala when confronted with trauma-related words (Protopopescu et al 2005) or masked fearful faces (Rauch et al 2000). However, this lateralized effect was not confirmed in a meta-analysis (Etkin and Wager 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All correlations are reported for po0.05, two-tailed. ANOVAs examining amygdala volume and function were conducted both including and excluding the subjects meeting PTSD, as PTSD has been associated with both increased (Protopopescu et al, 2005;Shin et al, 2004), and decreased amygdala activity (Britton et al, 2005); amygdala volume in PTSD has been shown not to be different from controls (Bremner, 2002;Wignall et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion recognition difficulties have been noted in persons with PTSD (Shin et al, 2005). One study showed increased initial amygdala response to trauma-related negative stimuli (Protopopescu et al, 2005), and another study showed exaggerated amygdala activation, and diminished medial prefrontal cortex activation, in response to fearful versus happy facial expressions (Shin et al, 2005).Collectively, results of numerous studies have demonstrated that within neural systems involved in affective functioning, different neuroanatomical loci or circuitry contributes to the recognition of different emotions and, further, that various neuropathological changes and conditions can result in distinct disruptions of these circuits leading to specific patterns of deficits. Accordingly, an examination of affect recognition abilities across multiple patient populations is likely to prove beneficial in the identification of the underlying neural regions that give rise to these deficits in alcoholic individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%