2003
DOI: 10.1002/tcm.10046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential toxic effect ofcis-platinum(II) and palladium(II) chlorides complexed with methyl 3,4-diamine-2,3,4,6-tetradeoxy-?-L-lyxo-hexopyranoside in mouse lymphoma cell lines differing in DSB and NER repair ability

Abstract: The aim of this work was to test the cytotoxicity of newly synthesized cis-type complexes of platinum(II) and palladium(II) dichloride with methyl 3,4-diamine-2,3,4,6-tetradeoxy-alpha-L-lyxohexopyranoside, [M(C(7)H(16)N(2)O(2))Cl(2)].H(2)O, against two mouse lymphoma cell lines (L5178Y) differing in their double strand breaks and nucleotide excision repair ability. cis- Diaminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) was used as a reference compound. The toxicity of Pt(C(7)H(16)N(2)O(2))Cl(2) appeared to be similar for both ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the use of wortmannin when using proliferation assays is not the best tool to asses DNA repair unambiguously, the experiments are interesting as they constitute evidence of a different behavior of Pd 2 ‐Spm relative to cDDP. Therefore, whichever the route involved in the different behavior of cDDP and Pd 2 ‐Spm in the presence of wortmannin, the data presently gathered suggest that there might be a significant mechanistic difference between these compounds as verified for other Pt(II) versus Pd(II) systems (54).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although the use of wortmannin when using proliferation assays is not the best tool to asses DNA repair unambiguously, the experiments are interesting as they constitute evidence of a different behavior of Pd 2 ‐Spm relative to cDDP. Therefore, whichever the route involved in the different behavior of cDDP and Pd 2 ‐Spm in the presence of wortmannin, the data presently gathered suggest that there might be a significant mechanistic difference between these compounds as verified for other Pt(II) versus Pd(II) systems (54).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The cytotoxicity of L-OHP in CDDP-resistant cell lines has been considered to be due to the differences of DNA damage and/or recognition processes between CDDP and L-OHP [46]. The DNA damage caused by Pd (II) compounds is reportedly processed in a different manner from that induced by Pt (II) complexes [47]. In the CDDP-resistant subline (MKN45 (CDDP)), [PdCl 2 (L)] showed significantly higher antitumor effects in vitro (Table 2) and in vivo (Figure 3) as compared with CDDP and [PtCl 2 (L)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, notwithstanding the lower water solubility, the corresponding neutral analogue Pt-7 was found equally active not only in murine L1210 leukemia cells but also toward two different murine L5178Y-S and L5178Y-R lymphoma cell lines differing in their doublestrand breaks and nucleotide excision repair ability [67,68].…”
Section: Amino-sugar Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%