1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90248-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential transcription of the two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding elongation factor 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among non‐Elongator factors able to contact Kti11p are 40S ribosomal proteins, Rps7Ap and Rps19Ap (Fig. 3B) (Baker et al ., 1996; Planta and Mager, 1998), and other translational factors: translation elongation factor 2 (EF2), Eft2p (Veldman et al ., 1994), Dph2p involved in diphthamide synthesis and Eft2p function (Mattheakis et al ., 1993) and Yil103wp, a product, consistent with our TAP approach, reported to interact with Dph2p by two‐hybrid analysis (Ito et al ., 2001) (Fig. 3B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among non‐Elongator factors able to contact Kti11p are 40S ribosomal proteins, Rps7Ap and Rps19Ap (Fig. 3B) (Baker et al ., 1996; Planta and Mager, 1998), and other translational factors: translation elongation factor 2 (EF2), Eft2p (Veldman et al ., 1994), Dph2p involved in diphthamide synthesis and Eft2p function (Mattheakis et al ., 1993) and Yil103wp, a product, consistent with our TAP approach, reported to interact with Dph2p by two‐hybrid analysis (Ito et al ., 2001) (Fig. 3B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that 21 spontaneous mutants with changes on EFT2 were found but that none had mutations on EFT1. This may be due to the partial dominance of the resistant phenotype and the fact that the EFT2 promoter seems to be 2.5-fold more active than that of EFT1 (24). A highly dominant phenotype may be needed to detect EFT1 mutants when EFT2 is being expressed at such high levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an available labeled analog of GM193663 which competes for binding and shows cross-resistance (data not shown). A background of binding activity was expected, and indeed was observed, due to the presence of the EF2 protein expressed from the EFT1 gene, the second gene encoding EF2 in S. cerevisiae (21,24). To simplify the system, EFT1 was interrupted in eight resistant strains with unique mutations in EF2.…”
Section: Gm193663-resistant Mutants Fall Into Two Complementation Gromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, in yeast, the essential eEF2 protein is encoded by two genes, EFT1 and EFT2. Both genes encode identical proteins with EFT1 producing $30% and EFT2 $70% of the transcripts (Veldman et al, 1994). Deletion of either gene results in reduced eEF2 levels without an apparent growth defect (Murray et al, 2016) and the crystal structure of the S. cerevisiae eEF2 in complex with the anti-fungal compound Sordarin (PDB: 1N0U) (Jørgensen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(legend continued on next page) (Perentesis et al, 1992;Veldman et al, 1994). While deletion of HGH1 does not impair growth (Rodriguez-Peñ a et al, 1998), deletion of both HGH1 and EFT2 causes a synthetic growth defect, suggesting a functional relation between eEF2 and Hgh1 (Costanzo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%