2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02864785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential utilization and ethnobotany of trees in kitulanghalo forest reserve and surrounding communal lands, eastern tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
93
3
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
93
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We formulated them in culturally appropriated and meaningful ways, using concepts that were not foreign to the cultural system of meaning. We also tested the questionnaire in each area during a pilot survey (Luoga et al 2000) to ensure that interpreters, respondents and we correctly understood the questions. This process allowed us to limit information distortion through translation.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formulated them in culturally appropriated and meaningful ways, using concepts that were not foreign to the cultural system of meaning. We also tested the questionnaire in each area during a pilot survey (Luoga et al 2000) to ensure that interpreters, respondents and we correctly understood the questions. This process allowed us to limit information distortion through translation.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between humans and plant resources has been investigated by ethnobotany not only in the Caatinga, but in many parts of the world (Hanazaki et al 2006, La Torre-Cuadros & Islebe 2003, Luoga et al 2000, Reyes-García et al 2005, Shanley & Rosa 2004. The first ethnobotanical studies documented knowledge that traditional populations retained about their biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first ethnobotanical studies documented knowledge that traditional populations retained about their biodiversity. Inthe 1990s, there was an increase in this research field at the time statistical tests, quantitative indexes, and hypothesis tests were adopted in investigations (Ferraz et al 2005, Hanazaki et al 2006, La Torre-Cuadros & Islebe 2003, Lucena et al 2007, Luoga et al 2000, Oliveira et al 2010, Phillips & Gentry 1993a, 1993b, Ramos et al 2008a, 2008b, Ribeiro et al 2014a, 2014b, Shanley & Rosa 2004. Standing out in this context are the use value index and the ecological apparency hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies evaluated species use-value for local populations, for showing which plants are preferred for each population (Phillips & Gentry, 1993b, Galeano, 2000, Crepaldi & Peixoto, 2010. Studies also related use-values with species availability in their natural ecosystems (Phillips & Gentry, 1993b, Torres-Cuadro & Islebe, 2003, Ferraz, Albuquerque, & Meunier, 2006, testing the hypothesis of the ecological appearance (Phillips & Gentry, 1993b) and making possible to identify over-exploration of plants (Luoga, Witkowski, & Balkwill, 2000). However, Phillips and Gentry (1993b) calculated the use-values index based in the knowledge of local informants about useful species (potential utilization value) and Lucena et al (2013) adapted this index, using the frequency of collection of the vegetation species by local informants (real utilization value).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%