Differentially expressed proteins during an incompatible interaction between common bean and the fungus Pseudocercospora griseola

Borges, Leandro Luiz; Santana, Fernanda Abreu; Castro, Isabel Samila Lima; Arruda, Klever Márcio Antunes; Ramos, Humberto Josué de Oliveira; Moreira, Maurílio Alves; Barros, Everaldo Gonçalves de

doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9922-0

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pathogen/herbivore activity that results in damage to photosynthetic machinery, loss of photosynthetic tissue, and/ or disruption of the vasculature affecting water and sugar transport has been shown to negatively impact photosynthesis (Aldea et al, 2005;Zou et al, 2005;Gutsche et al, 2009;Nabity et al, 2009;Kerchev et al, 2012). In addition, pathogen/herbivore attack has been shown to suppress components of photosynthesis at the levels of gene expression and of protein abundance (Zou et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2007;Denoux et al, 2008;Ishiga et al, 2009;Bilgin et al, 2010;Sugano et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2011b;Gohre et al, 2012;Guo et al, 2012;Borges et al, 2013). The negative impact of defense on photosynthesis has been best demonstrated in response to JA treatment, which results in a reduction of components essential for light harvesting and carbon fixation (Wierstra and Kloppstech, 2000;Chen et al, 2011b;Shan et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2012) as well as a substantial decrease in photosynthetic activities and chlorophyll contents in Arabidopsis (Jung, 2004).…”

Section: Impacts On Photosynthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In support of the growth-defense tradeoff theory, diversion of plant resources has been shown to occur at all levels, including machinery involved in transcription, translation, and protein secretion from cells as well as prioritization of carbon and nitrogen towards production of defense compounds. Transcriptomic and proteomic studies have demonstrated transcriptional reprogramming and altered protein profiles upon pathogen/herbivore detection to promote defense at the expense of growth Jung et al, 2007;Denoux et al, 2008;Bilgin et al, 2010;Sugano et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2011b;Gohre et al, 2012;Guo et al, 2012;Borges et al, 2013). Production and secretion of proteins with specific defensive properties, such as PR proteins, place a significant demand on the protein folding and secretory systems, which have also been shown to be required for defense (Wang et al, 2005;Kwon et al, 2008;Pajerowska-Mukhtar et al, 2012).…”

Section: Resource Diversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Growth-defense tradeoffs are thought to occur in plants due to resource restrictions, which demand prioritization towards either growth or defense, depending on external and internal factors. These tradeoffs have profound implications in agriculture and natural ecosystems, as both processes are vital for plant survival, reproduction, and, ultimately, plant fitness. While many of the molecular mechanisms underlying growth and defense tradeoffs remain to be elucidated, hormone crosstalk has emerged as a major player in regulating tradeoffs needed to achieve a balance. In this review, we cover recent advances in understanding growth-defense tradeoffs in plants as well as what is known regarding the underlying molecular mechanisms. Specifically, we address evidence supporting the growth-defense tradeoff concept, as well as known interactions between defense signaling and growth signaling. Understanding the molecular basis of these tradeoffs in plants should provide a foundation for the development of breeding strategies that optimize the growth-defense balance to maximize crop yield to meet rising global food and biofuel demands.

show abstract

Section: Impacts On Photosynthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resource Diversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The current proteomic analysis further indicated that 2-Cys Prx was specifically up-accumulated in the O 3 -exposed fruits that had been inoculated with B. cinerea . 2-Cys Prx is a distinct subgroup within the family of peroxiredoxins (PRXs) that are associated with resistance of plants to both biotic and abiotic stress, while in apple fruits, their downregulation has been linked to A. alternata susceptibility ( Borges et al, 2013 ; Ni et al, 2017 ; Ojeda et al, 2018 ). Given that PRXs are highly conserved antioxidant proteins that scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) ( Zhang et al, 2019 ), it can be hypothesized that the increased abundance of 2-Cys Prx in O 3 -treated fruit reduces ROS level in the host and protects apple cells from the pathogen invasion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unraveling Interactions of the Necrotrophic Fungal Species Botrytis cinerea With 1-Methylcyclopropene or Ozone-Treated Apple Fruit Using Proteomic Analysis

Testempasis

Tanou²,

Minas

et al. 2021

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gray mold caused by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea is one of the major postharvest diseases of apple fruit. The exogenous application of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and gaseous ozone (O 3) is commonly used to ensure postharvest fruit quality. However, the effect of these treatments on the susceptibility of apple fruit to postharvest pathogens remains largely unknown. Herein, the effect of O 3 and 1-MCP treatments on the development of gray mold on apple fruit (cv. “Granny Smith”) was investigated. Artificially inoculated apple fruits, treated or not with 1-MCP, were subjected for 2 months to cold storage [0°C, relative humidity (RH) 95%] either in an O3-enriched atmosphere or in a conventional cold chamber. Minor differences between 1-MCP-treated and control fruits were found in terms of disease expression; however, exposure to ozone resulted in a decrease of disease severity by more than 50% compared with 1-MCP-treated and untreated fruits. Proteomic analysis was conducted to determine proteome changes in the mesocarp tissue of control and 1-MCP- or O3-treated fruits in the absence or in the presence of inoculation with B. cinerea. In the non-inoculated fruits, 26 proteins were affected by 1-MCP, while 51 proteins were altered by ozone. Dynamic changes in fruit proteome were also observed in response to B. cinerea. In O3-treated fruits, a significant number of disease/defense-related proteins were increased in comparison with control fruit. Among these proteins, higher accumulation levels were observed for allergen, major allergen, ACC oxidase, putative NBS-LRR disease resistance protein, major latex protein (MLP)-like protein, or 2-Cys peroxiredoxin. In contrast, most of these proteins were down-accumulated in 1-MCP-treated fruits that were challenged with B. cinerea. These results suggest that ozone exposure may contribute to the reduction of gray mold in apple fruits, while 1-MCP was not effective in affecting this disease. This is the first study deciphering differential regulations of apple fruit proteome upon B. cinerea infection and postharvest storage treatments, underlying aspects of host response related to the gray mold disease.

show abstract

“…The Andean cultivar AND 277, developed by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Colombia (CIAT; Arruda et al., 2008), is considered an important source of resistance to multiple diseases such as ANT, ALS, and rust and has been widely used in bean breeding programs in Brazil and Southern Africa (Arruda et al., 2008; Carvalho et al., 1998). Notably, AND 277 possesses a resistance gene cluster at Pv01 containing two strongly linked disease resistance loci Co‐1 4 and Phg‐1 (Gonçalves‐Vidigal et al., 2011), exhibiting a broad‐spectrum resistance to races 9, 23, 64, 65, 67, 73, 75, 81, 83, 87, 89, 97, 117, 119, 339, 343, 449, 453, 1033, 2047, and 3481 of C. lindemuthianum (Alzate‐Marin et al, 2003; Arruda et al., 2008; Lima Castro et al., 2017) and races 7–15, 15–7, 23–23, 31–7, 31–17, 31–31, 31–39, 47–39, 61–31, 61–41, 63–6, 63–7, 63–19, 63–23, 63–31, 63–35, 63–47, and 63–63 of Pseudocercospora griseola (Borges et al., 2013; Caixeta et al., 2005). Still, a low genetic variability is observed in the Andean common bean gene pool relative to the Mesoamerican gene pool; therefore, timely information on resistance genes in cultivars belonging to this group provides an additional variability source reservoir.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic fine‐mapping of anthracnose disease‐resistance allele Co‐1⁴ present in the Andean common bean cultivar AND 277

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anthracnose (ANT) is among the common bean fungal diseases responsible for significant yield and grain quality losses. Durable genetic resistance is the primary ANT control method due to the pathogen's high variability. Genetic studies showed that the common bean chromosome Pv01 contains multiple disease resistance genes, includ- and CoPv01 CDRK . This work aimed to: (i) perform the genetic fine-mapping of the Co-1 4 allele present in the cultivar AND 277, using recombinant inbred lines derived from the cross between Rudá × AND 277; and (ii) identify candidate resistance genes in the Co-1 4 allele based on the common bean reference genome. Initially, the Co-1 4 allele was mapped between the single-nucleotide polymorphism markers ss715645251 and ss715645250 at a distance of 2.0 and 19.6 cM, respectively. Fine-mapping localized Co-1 4 between the markers ss715645251 and BARCPVSSR01356, spanning a 40.51 kb region at the end of Pv01. Two genes are described within the Co-1 4 region in the reference genome, Phvul.001G243800 and Phvul.001G243900. The linkage between the Co-1 4 allele and the markers ss715645251 and BARCPVSSR01356 will be essential for plant breeding programs during the resistance gene transfer to elite cultivars via markerassisted selection (MAS). Identifying and functionally analyzing candidate resistance genes in this region will allow more efficient MAS by developing accurate markers for ANT resistance.

show abstract

Differentially expressed proteins during an incompatible interaction between common bean and the fungus Pseudocercospora griseola

Cited by 9 publications

References 53 publications

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

Unraveling Interactions of the Necrotrophic Fungal Species Botrytis cinerea With 1-Methylcyclopropene or Ozone-Treated Apple Fruit Using Proteomic Analysis

Genetic fine‐mapping of anthracnose disease‐resistance allele Co‐1⁴ present in the Andean common bean cultivar AND 277

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Differentially expressed proteins during an incompatible interaction between common bean and the fungus Pseudocercospora griseola

Cited by 9 publications

References 53 publications

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

Growth–Defense Tradeoffs in Plants: A Balancing Act to Optimize Fitness

Unraveling Interactions of the Necrotrophic Fungal Species Botrytis cinerea With 1-Methylcyclopropene or Ozone-Treated Apple Fruit Using Proteomic Analysis

Genetic fine‐mapping of anthracnose disease‐resistance allele Co‐14 present in the Andean common bean cultivar AND 277

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Genetic fine‐mapping of anthracnose disease‐resistance allele Co‐1⁴ present in the Andean common bean cultivar AND 277