2011
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1104.0685
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentials of Cox rings: Jaczewski's theorem revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark. Theorem 1.5 from [KW11] assumes that the characteristic of k is zero. This is however not necessary.…”
Section: Lemma 4 Under the Above Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark. Theorem 1.5 from [KW11] assumes that the characteristic of k is zero. This is however not necessary.…”
Section: Lemma 4 Under the Above Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may expect Theorem 1 to hold more generally for X proper. However, our proof uses the characterization of toric varieties in terms of their Cox rings in the form stated in [KW11] which requires X to be projective. It is worth noting that similar characterizations have been obtained [BH07, Corollary 4.4] for X satisfying the A 2 condition: every two points have a common affine neighborhood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin with, we mention the recent paper [17] (which elaborates on [14]), where an arbitrary smooth complete toric variety T is characterized by the property that certain sheaf R T ∈ Ext 1 (O ⊕h 1,1 (X,C) T…”
Section: Introduction 11mentioning
confidence: 99%