2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiated livelihoods, local institutions, and the adaptation imperative: Assessing climate change adaptation policy in Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this background, it was not surprising that irrigation was scored quite low by both men (average score of 1.3) and women (average score of 1.6) in terms of its effectiveness in reducing climate risk in their respective household (Table S1). This is particularly telling since irrigation as an adaptation to climate change has been given a high priority by Tanzania’s national government as is evident in national documents such as the National Adaptation Program of Action (NAPA) and Kilimo Kwanza (Agriculture First) (Smucker et al 2015). More recently, Tanzania passed the 2013 National Irrigation Act in order to support smallholder farmers such as those in Kirya (URT 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this background, it was not surprising that irrigation was scored quite low by both men (average score of 1.3) and women (average score of 1.6) in terms of its effectiveness in reducing climate risk in their respective household (Table S1). This is particularly telling since irrigation as an adaptation to climate change has been given a high priority by Tanzania’s national government as is evident in national documents such as the National Adaptation Program of Action (NAPA) and Kilimo Kwanza (Agriculture First) (Smucker et al 2015). More recently, Tanzania passed the 2013 National Irrigation Act in order to support smallholder farmers such as those in Kirya (URT 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unstable conditions at the household level, such as land tenure issues, exacerbate and are exacerbated by weak governance. These local level challenges are often not addressed in larger scale policy as is pointed out by Smucker et al (2015) in regards to climate change adaptation policies in Tanzania. An effective definition of environmental vulnerability and wellbeing coupled with a household level vulnerability methodology can aid in the understanding of humaneenvironment interactions.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even farmers do not necessarily consider climate change to be the greatest threat they face (Mertz et al 2009;Wangui et al 2012). Disregarding these local perceptions and concerns, governments in Africa often echo former colonial/ metropolitan styles of top-down, technocratic planning (Scott 1998;Easterly 2014) and their current discourse of 'risk' and 'the climate imperative' (Pachauri 2009;Jasanoff 2012;Handmer and Dovers 2013;Smucker et al 2015).…”
Section: Challenges To Small Cities Facing Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%