2015
DOI: 10.17265/1539-8072/2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiated Use of the Cross-Lingual Strategy in Foreign Language Teaching: A Grounded Theory

Abstract: Despite its potential in foreign language education, the cross-lingual strategy has been marginalized and stigmatized in many EFL contexts including language education in private language schools of Iran. This study aims to uncover the facilitative role of the cross-lingual strategy in foreign language instruction by theorizing experienced language teachers' practice. To this end, some experienced teachers were selected in line with the sampling procedures of Grounded Theory from famous English language instit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar vein, more recently, Li (2018) also pointed to the mediating role of the L1 in opening up dialogue and bringing more target language into the conversation in the IRF cycle in classroom discourse. Also, the reason why Ostovar- Namaghi and Norouzi (2015) in their study suggested warmly favoring the use of the L1 by teachers in their class and allowing the learners to use both intra-and cross-lingual strategies to express themselves in the target language becomes clear. Additionally, the results of this study can be compared to the ones obtained by Wharton (2007), which highlighted the role of the native language to raise students' awareness about similarities and differences existing between the first and target languages and to help them find their own ways to express themselves in the foreign language.…”
Section: The Effect Of L1 Use On the Lexical And Grammatical Complexity Of L2 Oral Productionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a similar vein, more recently, Li (2018) also pointed to the mediating role of the L1 in opening up dialogue and bringing more target language into the conversation in the IRF cycle in classroom discourse. Also, the reason why Ostovar- Namaghi and Norouzi (2015) in their study suggested warmly favoring the use of the L1 by teachers in their class and allowing the learners to use both intra-and cross-lingual strategies to express themselves in the target language becomes clear. Additionally, the results of this study can be compared to the ones obtained by Wharton (2007), which highlighted the role of the native language to raise students' awareness about similarities and differences existing between the first and target languages and to help them find their own ways to express themselves in the foreign language.…”
Section: The Effect Of L1 Use On the Lexical And Grammatical Complexity Of L2 Oral Productionsmentioning
confidence: 94%