1990
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(90)90008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
228
0
12

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
228
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we suggest that for products carrying largely hedonic attributes, monetary promotions should be avoided while non-monetary actions are encouraged. Another interesting assumption is linked to the use of this tool to launch new products, given that this feeling is related to hedonic value perceptions (Kim, 2008;Venkatraman & Price, 1990), and the findings revealed a positive relationship between this perception and the intention to purchase a promoted product. (d) Nonmonetary promotions are more effective for reducing the perception of financial risk; i.e., discount promotions are not the most appropriate tools for encouraging the purchase of a product that evokes the perception of financial risk.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we suggest that for products carrying largely hedonic attributes, monetary promotions should be avoided while non-monetary actions are encouraged. Another interesting assumption is linked to the use of this tool to launch new products, given that this feeling is related to hedonic value perceptions (Kim, 2008;Venkatraman & Price, 1990), and the findings revealed a positive relationship between this perception and the intention to purchase a promoted product. (d) Nonmonetary promotions are more effective for reducing the perception of financial risk; i.e., discount promotions are not the most appropriate tools for encouraging the purchase of a product that evokes the perception of financial risk.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer innovativeness has two subscales: cognitive innovativeness and sensory innovativeness. 22 While cognitive innovativeness could be associated with the use of either English or ethnic portal websites, sensory innovativeness was deemed to be linked to an inclination to try new things, and therefore a willingness to adopt the internet, and also a greater preference for English websites (rather than ethnic portals).…”
Section: Measuring Internet Behaviours: Scales and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Goldsmith 26 found that innovativeness predicts both frequency of online buying and intentions to purchase online. Venkatraman and Price 22 identifi ed two dimensions of innovativeness: cognitive and sensory. Those high in sensory innovativeness are likely to seek novel sensory experiences.…”
Section: Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other researchers called Venkatraman & Price (1990) showed that the innovativeness has two dimensions including cognitive and sensory. These two researchers stated that the cognitive innovativeness is the tendency to adopt and employ the new products which leads to stimulation and excitement of the consumer mind, versus the sensory innovativeness which is the tendency of the consumer to employ the products which might stimulate the sensory excitement in him.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sproles & Kendall (1986) presented a list of shopping styles of the consumers including 8 different decision making styles for purchasing. One of the consequences of differentiating cognitive and sensory innovativeness is that consumers who have these different predispositions may have different adoption behavior and decision-making styles (Venkatraman & Price, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%