2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating between distribution and suitable habitat in ecological niche models: A red spruce (Picea rubens) case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 338 presence points and 169 true absence points were taken. True absence points were purposefully collected at least 30 m from the nearest red spruce presence points or in areas suitable for red spruce growth to increase model discrimination (Brown & Griscom 2022). True absences were only included in the SDM to increase discrimination within models so that current distribution would be more closely predicted rather than suitable habitat (Brown & Griscom 2022; Peters & Griscom 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 338 presence points and 169 true absence points were taken. True absence points were purposefully collected at least 30 m from the nearest red spruce presence points or in areas suitable for red spruce growth to increase model discrimination (Brown & Griscom 2022). True absences were only included in the SDM to increase discrimination within models so that current distribution would be more closely predicted rather than suitable habitat (Brown & Griscom 2022; Peters & Griscom 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True absence points were purposefully collected at least 30 m from the nearest red spruce presence points or in areas suitable for red spruce growth to increase model discrimination (Brown & Griscom 2022). True absences were only included in the SDM to increase discrimination within models so that current distribution would be more closely predicted rather than suitable habitat (Brown & Griscom 2022; Peters & Griscom 2022). Pseudo‐absence points, or randomly generated background points, were located throughout the state of Virginia in each model to avoid creating bias by only collecting absences in proximity to red spruce (Wisz & Guisan 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and using statistical algorithms to predict habitat suitability for a given species across a region of interest (Pearson, 2007;Elith and Franklin, 2013). ENM is often considered synonymous with Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) and Habitat Suitability Modeling (HSM), though (Brown and Griscom, 2022) highlight some important differences between the terms in certain contexts. ENM is commonly applied to studies researching the distributions of plant species (Carrell et al, 2022), and consequences of future climatic change on their geographic distribution (Nakao et al, 2013;Moor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ecological Niche Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Range-wide distribution modeling can be hindered by the lack of robust presence and absence data across broad areas occupied by the focal species (Brown and Griscom, 2022). Acquiring presence and/or absence data may be challenging because of species crypsis, difficulties accessing remote habitats, or the sheer size of many widespread species' distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults can be reliably identified using commercial satellite data (i.e., Google Maps, satellite view) or Light Detection and Radar Data (LiDAR; Esque et al, 2020a). Image-based empirical maps of the trees' distribution can be used with SDMs to enhance representative rangewide habitat suitability maps and explore occupied and potential habitat with great accuracy (Brown and Griscom, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%