2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-009-9560-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating Between Precursor and Control Variables When Analyzing Reasoned Action Theories

Abstract: This paper highlights the distinction between precursor and control variables in the context of reasoned action theory. Here the theory is combined with structural equation modeling to demonstrate how age and past sexual behavior should be situated in a reasoned action analysis. A two wave longitudinal survey sample of African-American adolescents is analyzed where the target behavior is having vaginal sex. Results differ when age and past behavior are used as control variables and when they are correctly used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the results do not support the model's “principle of theoretical sufficiency,” which contends that the impact of exogenous factors on behavior is mediated fully through cognitions (e.g., see Ajzen & Albarracin, 2007; Hennessy et al, 2010). However, one possible concern is that the IM measures address cognitions about the mother's behavior (e.g., attitude towards permitting the child to watch) but the outcome in the analysis is her report of how much watching the child does.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In particular, the results do not support the model's “principle of theoretical sufficiency,” which contends that the impact of exogenous factors on behavior is mediated fully through cognitions (e.g., see Ajzen & Albarracin, 2007; Hennessy et al, 2010). However, one possible concern is that the IM measures address cognitions about the mother's behavior (e.g., attitude towards permitting the child to watch) but the outcome in the analysis is her report of how much watching the child does.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recent developments in the study of normative influence have re-categorized norms into 'injunctive' (what is perceived as being approved or disapproved) and 'descriptive' (what appears to be actually occurring) components (Hennessy, 2010). Interventions that stress descriptive norms may not be effective if they reinforce the belief that challenges are too big for individual actions to have any impact on resolving them (Cialdini, 2007;Semenza et al, 2008).The weakness of simply providing information in anticipation of it leading to behaviour change is acknowledged in the extant literature; as are the inadequacies of many current theories in capturing and charting the interaction of these factors across different population groups (Lorenzoni et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focused on smokers' intention to engage in such actions. Following the approach described by Hennessy et al (2010) for conducting the theory of planned behavior analyses, we treated exposure to a smoke-free air law (i.e., a policy intervention) and extent of agreement with regulating smoking in public places (i.e., a policy-specific variable) as background variables. Importantly, this is different from Fong et al's (2006) framework, which conceptualizes the policy-specific variable as mediating the effect of exposure to policy on cessation behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%