Differentiating borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder through emotional dependency, emotional instability, impulsiveness and aggressiveness traits

Carvalho, Lucas Francisco de; Pianowski, Giselle

doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2019.03.001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The heterogeneity of findings across studies was large ( I 2 = 83.11%) and significant ( Q (5) = 29.61; p < 0.001). With the exception of Carvalho and Pianowski (2019) and Watkins' (2009) works, all studies were carried out among nonclinical samples. Excluding the previously mentioned studies, the heterogeneity across results remained large and significant ( Q (3) = 20.94; p < 0.001; I 2 = 85.67%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rumination as a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta‐analytic review

Cavicchioli

Maffei

2021

J Clin Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The current quantitative review aims at comprehensively clarifying the role of rumination in borderline personality disorder (BPD) considering its relevance for several clinical models of the disorder. Method This meta‐analysis included 29 independent studies assessing different forms of rumination—general tendency to engage in ruminative thinking patterns and four types of emotion‐based rumination among both nonclinical subjects reporting BPD features and patients with BPD. Furthermore, the study tested whether rumination could be considered a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in BPD. Results Meta‐analytic procedures were based on 46 r coefficients that showed large pooled effect sizes for all forms of rumination. With the exception of interpersonal rumination, the remaining forms of rumination were equally involved in BPD features. Conclusions Rumination should be considered a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in BPD. Future studies should provide longitudinal and contextual‐based evaluations of rumination among treatment‐seeking individuals with BPD.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rumination as a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta‐analytic review

Cavicchioli

Maffei

2021

J Clin Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although studies have been conducted to investigate the discriminant ability of IDCP-2 for specific conditions (e.g., borderline personality disorder, dependent personality disorder, bipolar disorder; Carvalho & Pianowski, 2019a;2019b;Carvalho, Painwoski, & Gonçalves, 2018), no studies were found investigating its discriminant capacity for people with substance dependence. However, based on the literature (APA, 2013;Bornovalova et al, 2005;Kotov et al, 2017;Moraleda-Barreno, Díaz-Batanero, Pérez-Moreno, Gómez-Bujedo, & Lozano, 2018), it is possible to identify the conceptual relevant IDCP-2 factors for this purpose: Anxious Concern, Hopelessness, Superiority, Dominance, Indifference, Anxiety, Depression, Risk-taking, Deceitfulness, and Impulsivity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation on the capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 for identifying people with substance dependence

Gonçalves

Salvador

Carvalho

2021

Acta. Colomb. Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to verify the discriminant capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) in the identification of people with substance dependence, as well as to compare this capacity with another instrument that evaluates pathological traits, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The sample was composed of 253 adults distributed in three groups: community sample, represented by 110 individuals with ages between 20 and 66 years (M = 32.3; SD = 10,1), 71.8% women; subclinical, 119 individual aged from 18 to 63 (M = 30.4; SD = 8.34), 61.3% women; clinical, 24 individual with ages between 19 and 59 (M = 36,4; SD = 11.2), 83.3% men. Two scales for substance dependence identification were administered (AUDIT and ASSIST), IDCP-2, and PID-5. Findings indicated that IDCP-2 is capable of discriminating between groups, mainly the extreme ones (i.e., clinical sample versus community sample). Moreover, similar discriminant capacity between IDCP-2 and PID-5 was observed. These findings are preliminary evidence that the IDCP-2 factors can identify people with substance dependence, with Hopelessness being the leading factor in the assessment of substance dependents.

show abstract

Differentiating borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder through emotional dependency, emotional instability, impulsiveness and aggressiveness traits

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

Rumination as a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta‐analytic review

Rumination as a widespread emotion‐based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta‐analytic review

Investigation on the capacity of the factors of the Clinical Dimensional Personality Inventory 2 for identifying people with substance dependence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About