2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04595-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiating migraine, cervicogenic headache and asymptomatic individuals based on physical examination findings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background Migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) are common headache disorders, although the large overlap of symptoms between them makes differential diagnosis challenging. To strengthen differential diagnosis, physical testing has been used to examine for the presence of musculoskeletal impairments in both conditions. This review aimed to systematically evaluate differences in physical examination findings between people with migraine, CGH and asymptomatic individuals. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if changes in mechanical behaviors occurring during acute pain could have a short-term benefit, they often cause long-term mechanical consequences, as increased muscle stiffness and reduced movement variability (54). Thus, the reduction in upper cervical spine passive mobility (7,9,10,(55)(56)(57) and the alteration in cervical motor recruitment (7,9,10,58,59) observed in migraine patients outside the ictal phase could be a consequence of changes in mechanical behaviors observed during the headache phase. This will lead to a vicious cycle where 1) a migraine attack could affect cervical mechanical behaviors with a transitory reduction in active movement and a long-lasting impairment in passive mobility and motor control (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if changes in mechanical behaviors occurring during acute pain could have a short-term benefit, they often cause long-term mechanical consequences, as increased muscle stiffness and reduced movement variability (54). Thus, the reduction in upper cervical spine passive mobility (7,9,10,(55)(56)(57) and the alteration in cervical motor recruitment (7,9,10,58,59) observed in migraine patients outside the ictal phase could be a consequence of changes in mechanical behaviors observed during the headache phase. This will lead to a vicious cycle where 1) a migraine attack could affect cervical mechanical behaviors with a transitory reduction in active movement and a long-lasting impairment in passive mobility and motor control (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although headache is the most common, a broader spectrum of symptoms is present in patients with migraine (2). As one of the most frequent concomitant symptoms is neck pain (3,4), the role of cervical musculoskeletal impairments (CMIs) has been widely studied in migraine patients (58), leading to the conclusion that this subgroup of patients presents a higher prevalence of CMIs than healthy controls (9,10). However, it is still unclear which mechanism underly the presence of CMIs in the migraine population and their relation with migraine pathophysiology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The methodological quality of studies was assessed through an adapted version of the Downs and Black Risk of Bias Checklist, 25 which is recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 21 and used widely in systematic reviews of case-control studies. [26][27][28][29] The scale was adapted by excluding items referring to intervention assessment (items 4, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21-24, and 26). The risk of bias was calculated through the quality index (QI), classifying the studies into low, moderate, or high quality.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Moreover, the clinical pattern of penumbra between migraine and cervicogenic headache, due to the involvement of converging regions, makes it difficult to diagnose and to treat them adequately in up to 50% of the cases. 6 The prevalence of cervicogenic headache varies according to the diagnostic criteria used, following the IHS criteria the prevalence is 0.4% 2 , and according to the Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group (CHISG) the prevalence in the population is 4.6% 7 , with the average prevalence within the headache population being approximately 17,8% 3 . The diagnostic criteria will be discussed and detailed later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%