2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000154217.71461.b4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Pleural Effusion in Patients With Extra-Pleural Primary Malignancies

Abstract: On PET-CT, the presence of concomitant pleural abnormalities is the most accurate criterion in determining the malignant nature of pleural effusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
33
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With logistic analysis, pleural uptake on PETimageswasthemostimportantparameterforindentifyingmalignantpleuraleffusionofNSCLC.Itshowedthatthe respective sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were87.5,88.8,95.5,72.7,and87.8%.Theseresultsweresimilar or mildly lower than previous reported measures [8][9][10][11]19].However,theaccuracyofourresultsonPETimageswas better than that of pleural fluid cytology and blind pleural biopsy [17].ThisrepresentsthatFDGPET/CTmaysubstitute otherinvasivetestsincaseswherethoracocentesisisconsideredimpossibleorofhighriskfortheelderly,orinsufficient quantity of pleural fluid is present. Unlike other studies [9,19],theaccuracyofourresultswaslowerthanthatofthoracoscopicbiopsy.Furthermore,consideringtheNPVofthecurrent study, it is doubtful that F-18 FDG PET/CT can completely replace thoracoscopic biopsy in pleural malignancy evaluation of lung cancer patients. As Schaffler et al [10] argue,F-18FDGPET/CTcanhelppinpointtheareasofmaximal activity of malignant pleural disease and navigate towardsthemostappropriateareaofbiopsy [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With logistic analysis, pleural uptake on PETimageswasthemostimportantparameterforindentifyingmalignantpleuraleffusionofNSCLC.Itshowedthatthe respective sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were87.5,88.8,95.5,72.7,and87.8%.Theseresultsweresimilar or mildly lower than previous reported measures [8][9][10][11]19].However,theaccuracyofourresultsonPETimageswas better than that of pleural fluid cytology and blind pleural biopsy [17].ThisrepresentsthatFDGPET/CTmaysubstitute otherinvasivetestsincaseswherethoracocentesisisconsideredimpossibleorofhighriskfortheelderly,orinsufficient quantity of pleural fluid is present. Unlike other studies [9,19],theaccuracyofourresultswaslowerthanthatofthoracoscopicbiopsy.Furthermore,consideringtheNPVofthecurrent study, it is doubtful that F-18 FDG PET/CT can completely replace thoracoscopic biopsy in pleural malignancy evaluation of lung cancer patients. As Schaffler et al [10] argue,F-18FDGPET/CTcanhelppinpointtheareasofmaximal activity of malignant pleural disease and navigate towardsthemostappropriateareaofbiopsy [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…They found that the most accurate parameter when identifying pleural effusion is the presence of increased uptake in the pleuraonPET/CTimages [19]. The quantitative parameter (L/Prim) and PET/CT parameters(pleuraluptakeonPETimagesandabnormalpleural lesionsonCTimages)showedsimilardiagnosticvalueswhen distinguishingbetweenmalignantandbenignpleuraleffusion by ROC analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pleural effusion and metastases are also encountered when staging patients with lung cancer. It is broadly accepted that PET is inferior to CT in detecting pleural effusion; however, studies have shown that PET might be useful in discriminating between malignant and benign pleural effusion diagnosed by CT [70,71,72]. …”
Section: Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A physical finding is characteristic of pleural effusion, and chest radiography and MSCT scan are considered "gold standards" in imaging diagnostics of pleural empyema. Positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) does not appear to be a diagnostic tool in evaluating patients with pleural effusion due to its low specificity and subsequent difficulty in differentiating between inflammatory and neoplastic disease (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%