2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the ability of WBI to sterilize unidentified disease elsewhere in the breast decreases as the incidental lesion size increases. Because MRI can detect tumors less than 1 cm with greater sensitivity than mammography or ultrasonography, 16 MRI could ensure PBI ipsilateral tumor control rates similar to those of patients receiving WBI. Our data suggest that MRI should be considered strongly for assessing PBI eligibility to minimize out-of-field failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the ability of WBI to sterilize unidentified disease elsewhere in the breast decreases as the incidental lesion size increases. Because MRI can detect tumors less than 1 cm with greater sensitivity than mammography or ultrasonography, 16 MRI could ensure PBI ipsilateral tumor control rates similar to those of patients receiving WBI. Our data suggest that MRI should be considered strongly for assessing PBI eligibility to minimize out-of-field failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented in Figures 5,6,7,8,9, and 10 answer the five questions the study was set out to address. Figure 5 shows a plot of the average distance, in pixels, over all participants, between the location of the area of maximum metabolic activity selected on the MRI and the PET grayscale images when viewed side-by-side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, F-18-FDG PET [2][3][4][5] and highresolution and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [6][7][8][9][10][11] have steadily gained acceptance in addition to X-ray mammography and ultrasonography. Initial experience with combined PET (functional imaging) and MRI (anatomical localization) has yielded positive results, providing benefits compared to either modality alone [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of morphological information was studied in a report from Gibbs et al, 26 who examined the role of MRI in differentiating less than 1 cm diameter benign from malignant lesions, using a high temporal resolution dynamic two-dimensional FSPGR technique (11 seconds) and high spatial resolution post-contrast T1-weighted imaging. Radiological assessment of the post-contrast data provided a diagnostic accuracy rate of 69%, compared with the exchange rate constant calculated from the DCE-MRI data, which revealed a diagnostic accuracy rate of 74%.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Techniques and Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%