Differentiation of Colombian university mission statements

Abstract

PurposeA mission statement is the central axis of any organization and the cornerstone of its strategic planning. Universities have implemented this tool to define, among other things, its identity; however, the legal nature and functions of the mission statement have not been determined. In this article, the authors analyze the differences in the university mission statements of public and private higher education institutions in relation to the mission functions proposed by the 1992 legislation on higher education in Colombia – Law 30 – involving teaching, research, extension and social projection and internationalization.Design/methodology/approachThrough content analysis, the authors analyze the mission statements of two groups of institutions that make up the totality of universities in Colombia – 32 public and 53 private universities. The analysis is conducted along the four dimensions defined by the law as comprising the higher education mission, i.e. teaching, research, extension and social projection, and internationalization, due to its importance in the high-quality institutional accreditation process.FindingsBased on the differences identified in the mission statements, the authors establish the university functions and determine how they give back to society in their legal capacity as public or private institutions.Research limitations/implicationsThis research scenario is appropriate for answering research questions related to whether there are differences in the strategies of Colombian public and private universities based on their mission statements. Although the Colombian higher education system includes various types of tertiary institutions, only universities are included in the study.Practical implicationsResearch has shown that regardless of their legal nature, based on their mission statements, Colombian universities are mainly geared towards teaching. However, when comparing additional dimensions, private universities are less involved in research processes and more focused on activities related to social impact than are public universities. Additionally, private universities are more engaged in internationalization than are public institutions, with mission statements focused on both national and international accreditation processes.Social implicationsThe results of this research are intended to help society comprehend the differences between public and private universities in Colombia based on mission statements, which can contribute to understanding, among other factors, the academic programs offered by universities and how they should guide their activities.Originality/valueThis is the first such study in Colombia, a country that provides higher education through public and private institutions in very similar proportions, that analyses the differences in university mission statements and whose findings contribute to understanding whether universities are strategically oriented towards their own established policies or to contributing to the development of new public policies aimed at supporting the country's development process.

The mission statement in Catholic higher education organizations and identity challenges

“…We also argue that, despite the tension of the efforts to preserve values and the efforts to adapt to the environment, the Class 4 CHEOs seem to have good results and are strategically incorporating their Charisma in their mission statement. Mission statements of HEOs, and also CHEOs, should be strategically oriented (Gonzalez-Campo et al, 2021;Alegre et al, 2018).…”

“…Regarding CHEOs, controlled by orders and congregations, there is an imbalance between the impact on the organizational identity of the Charisma of the religious organization and the characteristics of the academic community (Alperstedt et al. , 2006; Lee, 2017; Gonzalez-Campo et al. , 2021), concerning free-thinking and research freedom (Naughton and Bausch, 1996).…”

“…HEOs, especially universities, are complex organizations with solid identity characteristics (Gioia and Thomas, 1996). Regarding CHEOs, controlled by orders and congregations, there is an imbalance between the impact on the organizational identity of the Charisma of the religious organization and the characteristics of the academic community (Alperstedt et al, 2006;Lee, 2017;Gonzalez-Campo et al, 2021), concerning free-thinking and research freedom (Naughton and Bausch, 1996). The values of the academic community may also challenge the Charisma.…”