2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of five body fluids from forensic samples by expression analysis of four microRNAs using quantitative PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
49
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other biomarkers, such as RNAs, have also been proposed and employed in forensic science [29][30][31] and, in addition, with advances in molecular biological techniques, novel approaches based on miRNA profi ling have been developed for a possible forensic application [32]. For example, the circulating miRNAs have been considered as potential tool for identifi cation of sex [33], body fl uids [34,35] or organ tissue types [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other biomarkers, such as RNAs, have also been proposed and employed in forensic science [29][30][31] and, in addition, with advances in molecular biological techniques, novel approaches based on miRNA profi ling have been developed for a possible forensic application [32]. For example, the circulating miRNAs have been considered as potential tool for identifi cation of sex [33], body fl uids [34,35] or organ tissue types [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, such as immunoassay, PCR is more time-saving, sensitive and accurate. After nearly 40 years development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [2,3], clinical testing [4,5], food quarantine [6,7], forensic identification [8,9], customs inspection [10] and in various other fields [11][12][13][14]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry; and it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, PCR is more time-saving, more sensitive and more accurate. After nearly 40 years of development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting disease genes and pathogenic microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [4,5], clinical testing [6,7], food quarantine [8,9], forensic identification [10,11], customs inspection [12] and in various other fields [13][14][15][16]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry about; it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, is more likely to produce by-products, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%