2005
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/88181612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Abstract: Non-invasive differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced phase inversion ultrasound to differentiate between histologically proven FNH and HCA, analysing the arterial and (early) portal venous phase. 32 patients with histological proven FNH (n=24) or HCA (n=8) have been included in this prospective study. Examination technique: Siemens Elegra, phase inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
112
2
22

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
112
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…A few remained mildly hyperechoic or became slightly hypoechoic. These findings of ours are consistent with those that have emerged from previous studies [71,72], and they provide confirmation based on a larger series of lesions of previous descriptions of the CEUS features of FNH: intense, homogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase (present in 97.7% of the patients we examined) and isoechogenicity or weak hyperechogenicity in the portal and parenchymal phases (95.4% of our cases). None of the lesions we studied presented frank hypoechogenicity in the late phase, a feature that is more suggestive of a malignant lesion.…”
Section: Sonographic Featuressupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few remained mildly hyperechoic or became slightly hypoechoic. These findings of ours are consistent with those that have emerged from previous studies [71,72], and they provide confirmation based on a larger series of lesions of previous descriptions of the CEUS features of FNH: intense, homogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase (present in 97.7% of the patients we examined) and isoechogenicity or weak hyperechogenicity in the portal and parenchymal phases (95.4% of our cases). None of the lesions we studied presented frank hypoechogenicity in the late phase, a feature that is more suggestive of a malignant lesion.…”
Section: Sonographic Featuressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Its use in FNH patients was evaluated in a recent study [71], whose results have yet to be validated in other series. In 23 of the 24 FNH nodules examined, second-generation CEUS revealed marked hyperechogenicity in both the arterial phase (8e22 s after injection of the contrast agent) and the early portal phase (12e30 s after injection).…”
Section: Sonographic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differentiation is essential because of different therapeutic approaches. 19 In contrast, the role of real-time CEUS in characterizing hemangiomas has not yet been determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria reported for this setting were peripheral nodular enhancement during the arterial phase, iris-diaphragm sign using time-analysis of contrast enhancement within 0-180 seconds to analyze the arterial phase in comparison with the hepatic artery and portal venous phase in comparison with the surrounding portal vein (branches) as described. 13,19 Reference Imaging Examinations and Liver Biopsy. Reference imaging examinations (e.g., CT, MRI, and scintigraphy) were performed as part of the clinical workup of the patients-in several cases outside of our institution-and not for the purpose of this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acronym CEUS refers to contrast-enhanced ultrasound techniques in general [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) refers to quantitative time intensity curve (TIC) analysis [11][12][13] using either bolus injection of microbubbles [13][14][15][16] or intravenous infusion with disruption-replenishment technique [17] which are used for treatment response evaluation in oncology [18] and for activity assessment in inflammation of the bowel wall in inflammatory bowel disease [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: An Introduction To Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%