2020
DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of intraspecific phenotypic plasticity of elongate glassy perchlet, Chanda nama: Insights into landmark-based truss morphometric and meristic variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent misclassification during analysis, a ratio of 3-3.5 between the minimum number of samples (N) and characters (P) are required (Kocovsky et al, 2009). Numerous investigations undertaken along this line have revealed comparable ratios, including 4.32 for Capoeta capoeta gracilis from the River Tajan, Iran (AnvariFar et al, 2011), 14.3 for Labeo rohita, India (Mir et al, 2013), 16.66 for Nandus nandus, Bangladesh (Mahfuj et al, 2020), 3.50 for Chanda nama, Bangladesh (Azad et al, 2020) and 14.30 for Cirrhinus mrigala in Ganges river from India (Dwivedi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To prevent misclassification during analysis, a ratio of 3-3.5 between the minimum number of samples (N) and characters (P) are required (Kocovsky et al, 2009). Numerous investigations undertaken along this line have revealed comparable ratios, including 4.32 for Capoeta capoeta gracilis from the River Tajan, Iran (AnvariFar et al, 2011), 14.3 for Labeo rohita, India (Mir et al, 2013), 16.66 for Nandus nandus, Bangladesh (Mahfuj et al, 2020), 3.50 for Chanda nama, Bangladesh (Azad et al, 2020) and 14.30 for Cirrhinus mrigala in Ganges river from India (Dwivedi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To avoid inaccuracy during analysis, an N:P ratio of at least 3-3.5 is essential [55]. Various studies in this line found a parallel ratio of 4.32 in Capoeta, capoeta gracilis [56], 16.66 in Nandus nandus [57], 14.3 in Labeo rohita [58], 5.89 in Cirrhinus mrigala [59], 3.50 in Chanda nama [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously mentioned specialist may have tested stocks that was encountering comparable ecological conditions or had a typical progenitor and consequently were not go through separation notwithstanding being secluded geologically. Notwithstanding morphometric characters, a truss network framework have been utilized by various researcher and has significant rule to recognize species, subspecies, races, and strains (Siddik et al, 2016;Ethin et al, 2019;Gain et al, 2017;Mahfuj et al, 2017;Azad et al, 2020;Mahfuj et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%