2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of methylenedioxybenzylpiperazines (MDBPs) and methoxymethylbenzylpiperazines (MMBPs) By GC-IRD and GC–MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GC‐MS is the most widely used technique in the analysis of controlled substances in forensic laboratories . A recent report showed that 3,4‐MDBP could not be differentiated from its 2,3‐regioisomer using mass spectrometry even after chemical derivatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GC‐MS is the most widely used technique in the analysis of controlled substances in forensic laboratories . A recent report showed that 3,4‐MDBP could not be differentiated from its 2,3‐regioisomer using mass spectrometry even after chemical derivatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] GC-MS is the most widely used technique in the analysis of controlled substances in forensic laboratories. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] A recent report [19] showed that 3,4-MDBP could not be differentiated from its 2,3-regioisomer using mass spectrometry even after chemical derivatization. However, gas chromatography-infrared detection (GC-IRD) provided discrimination between these two compounds based on differences in position and intensity in their IR absorption bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of drugs of abuse in biological and forensic samples has been the focus of many studies over the past years. Gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) is the most widely used technique in the analysis of controlled substances in forensic laboratories . A recent report showed that 3,4‐MDBP cannot be differentiated from its 2,3 regioisomer using mass spectrometry even after chemical derivatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC‐MS is the most commonly employed technique in the analysis of controlled substances in forensic laboratories . The identification of psychoactive drugs in a number of chemical categories is complicated by the existence of regioisomeric and isobaric substances related to the target drug . These isomeric substances are a challenge to forensic analyses that must depend heavily on mass spectrometry for confirmation level data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21] The identification of psychoactive drugs in a number of chemical categories is complicated by the existence of regioisomeric and isobaric substances related to the target drug. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] These isomeric substances are a challenge to forensic analyses that must depend heavily on mass spectrometry for confirmation level data. These regioisomeric and isobaric substances have the same nominal mass and yield essentially identical mass spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%