1984
DOI: 10.1021/ac00275a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of monoepoxide isomers of polyunsaturated fatty acids and fatty acid esters by low-energy charge exchange mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been developed, depending on the structure of the compound in questions. In the case of epoxides formed by oxidation of a terminal double bond, Elms allows an easy determination of the location (180) whereas in the case of monoepoxides obtained from polyunsaturated fatty acids, the determination is best performed by charge exchange mass spectrometry at low energy (181). Chemical ionization (with isobutane or nitric oxide) has also been used for the determination of the location of epoxide rings (182,183).…”
Section: Ivs22 Epoxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been developed, depending on the structure of the compound in questions. In the case of epoxides formed by oxidation of a terminal double bond, Elms allows an easy determination of the location (180) whereas in the case of monoepoxides obtained from polyunsaturated fatty acids, the determination is best performed by charge exchange mass spectrometry at low energy (181). Chemical ionization (with isobutane or nitric oxide) has also been used for the determination of the location of epoxide rings (182,183).…”
Section: Ivs22 Epoxidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of differences in fragmentation patterns after collision-induced dissociation (CID) is still the most common and well-studied approach. 1À3,5À7,9,10 Other techniques exploit differences in physical properties of isomeric ions: migration rates of ions through a neutral gas (ion mobility spectrometry), 11,12 reactivities of ions, 13,14 charge exchange MS, 15,16 direct photon absorption or emission, 17,18 variable wavelength photodissociation in the infrared, 19À23 visible 24 or ultraviolet 25 with one or more 26,27 lasers, differences in photodissociation by rapid pulse shaping over an approximate Gaussian wavelength distribution centered at 800 nm, 28,29 and relatively high-resolution spectroscopy…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem has been approached in different ways, some more successful than others, depending on the nature of the precursor ions. Use of differences in fragmentation patterns after collision-induced dissociation (CID) is still the most common and well-studied approach. , ,, Other techniques exploit differences in physical properties of isomeric ions: migration rates of ions through a neutral gas (ion mobility spectrometry), , reactivities of ions, , charge exchange MS, , direct photon absorption or emission, , variable wavelength photodissociation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet with one or more , lasers, differences in photodissociation by rapid pulse shaping over an approximate Gaussian wavelength distribution centered at 800 nm, , and relatively high-resolution spectroscopy in cold traps. , In cases relying on dissociation of a precursor ion, the mass spectra may be too similar to assign particular isomers from the product ion ratios with confidence. This can occur for several reasons: (1) product ion ratios frequently differ somewhat among different instruments; (2) product ion ratios can vary somewhat using the same instrument under supposedly identical conditions; (3) methods of processing digitized spectral data vary, and at least some error is introduced in quantitation of spectral peaks depending on the processing method; (4) white noise is present to varying extents; and (5) a proper statistical evaluation of data is often not performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach had utility for gleaning one-dimensional structural information. 8 Regarding sensitivity, in a recent study using membraneinterface mass spectrometry (MIMS) and an ion trap, charge-exchange ionization with solvent vapor led to ion currents even higher than those observed for EI in several cases. 9 Finally, it is generally appreciated that low-pressure CI using an ion trap can be at least as sensitive as electron ionization on the same instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%