“…Grayscale sonographic evaluations of the tumors included the long and short diameters of the tumors, shape (ratio of the long diameter to short diameter), border characteristics (well defined [>90%] or presence of a poorly defined border), echogenicity (hypoechoic, isoechoic, or hyperechoic compared with the adjacent normal parenchyma of the salivary gland), heterogeneity (homogeneous or heterogeneous internal echo texture), and presence of cystic areas (no cystic change, partial cystic change [≤50%], or predominant cystic change [>50%]). The vascular patterns of the salivary gland tumors were evaluated in terms of vascular distributions (avascular, absence of flow signals within the tumors; central [internal], vascular signals in tumor masses; peripheral, vascular signals along the periphery of the tumors; or mixed, presence of both peripheral and central flow) and internal vascularity (grade 0, no visible tumor vessels; grade 1, consistent detection of 1 or 2 separate vessels; grade 2, consistent detection of 3–5 separate visible vessels; and grade 3, > 5 separate visible vessels; same grading system as in a previous study on both power Doppler and microvascular sonography based on the imaging planes that showed the largest axial diameters of the tumors (Figures ).…”