2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0275-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of serrated and non-serrated blades from stab marks in bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
65
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since costal cartilage is closely associated with the bone of the ribs and sternum, the question arises whether stabs from serrated blades implicating bone also leave striation patterns within bone. Serrated and non-serrated blade stabs to bone have been studied [9,10], but stab wall striations within bone have not been described, although similar tool marks are well-recognised surface features of the cutting, chopping and sawing of bone [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since costal cartilage is closely associated with the bone of the ribs and sternum, the question arises whether stabs from serrated blades implicating bone also leave striation patterns within bone. Serrated and non-serrated blade stabs to bone have been studied [9,10], but stab wall striations within bone have not been described, although similar tool marks are well-recognised surface features of the cutting, chopping and sawing of bone [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect detailed analysis of the naked eye morphology of stab wounds may prove to be more valuable than exploring applications of modern technology such as electron microscopy and elemental analysis [9]. Since costal cartilage is closely associated with the bone of the ribs and sternum, the question arises whether stabs from serrated blades implicating bone also leave striation patterns within bone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tool marks identification on bone is under researched with the majority of sharp blade trauma focused on knife [1][2][3][4] and saw tool marks [5][6]. The four studies on Samurai sword trauma derived from archaeological specimens [7][8][9][10] and only one study from a forensic context [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, in order to define the marks left by a particular instrument, i.e., in case of sharp, blunt, or gunshot wounds, it is helpful to perform an experiment using that instrument [1–9]. Although, in the case of sharp force traumas, it is possible to differentiate between injuries in bones or cartilages caused with serrated and non-serrated instruments (i.e., knives), the differentiation of the instrument in case of injuries to the skin and soft tissue is much more difficult [10, 11]. However, in some cases, conducting an experiment can make it possible to confirm or exclude the use of the examined instrument and avoid misidentification of an injury’s origin [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%