2009
DOI: 10.1094/asbcj-2009-0309-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Species Belonging to Saccharomyces Sensu Stricto Using a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, a successfully amplified STA1 gene could be detected with a CRISPR-Cas12a reaction combined with two different visual detection methods (fluorescence and lateral flow). The STA1 gene could also be detected directly using only LAMP amplification and gel electrophoresis as in Figure 4, and this has also been previously demonstrated (Hayashi et al 2009), or as change in fluorescence or colour with DNA-binding dyes (Dao Thi et al 2020). However, isothermal methods tend to have a high rate of non-specific amplification, but CRISPR-Cas systems, on the other hand, have high specificity and sensitivity (Mahas et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultimately, a successfully amplified STA1 gene could be detected with a CRISPR-Cas12a reaction combined with two different visual detection methods (fluorescence and lateral flow). The STA1 gene could also be detected directly using only LAMP amplification and gel electrophoresis as in Figure 4, and this has also been previously demonstrated (Hayashi et al 2009), or as change in fluorescence or colour with DNA-binding dyes (Dao Thi et al 2020). However, isothermal methods tend to have a high rate of non-specific amplification, but CRISPR-Cas systems, on the other hand, have high specificity and sensitivity (Mahas et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Of the three compared pre-amplification methods, LAMP appeared to be the most promising in that it could clearly differentiate a STA1+ from a STA1- strain, and the reaction could be performed isothermally. PCR and LAMP primers for STA1 gene detection have been previously developed (Yamauchi et al 1998; Hayashi et al 2009), but the existing primers could not be used here as they do not produce amplicons containing the Cas12a protospacer sequence. Primer design to produce amplicons containing the Cas12a protospacer sequence proved challenging, which is evident from the poor specificity observed during the RPA amplifications and some of the PCR primers, and the failed amplification for the second set of LAMP primers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, a successfully amplified STA1 gene could be detected with a CRISPR-Cas12a reaction combined with two different visual detection methods (fluorescence and lateral flow). The STA1 gene could also be detected directly using LAMP amplification and gel electrophoresis (Figure 3), as previously demonstrated (Hayashi et al 2009), or through a change in fluorescence or colour with DNA-binding dyes (Dao Thi et al 2020). However, because of the high amplification efficiency of LAMP, and products with multiple repeats, the technique is prone to non-specific amplification and false positives (Ho et al 2018;Bao et al 2020;Zhang et al 2021).…”
Section: D Bmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…-Of the three pre-amplification methods, LAMP was the most promising in that it could clearly differentiate a STA1 ⁺ from a STA1strain, and the reaction could be performed isothermally. LAMPbased protocols for the detection of beer spoilage microorganisms have been reported previously (Tsuchiya et al 2007;Hayashi et al 2009). PCR and LAMP primers for STA1 gene detection have been developed (Yamauchi et al 1998;Hayashi et al 2009), but the primers could not be used here as they do not produce amplicons containing the Cas12a protospacer sequence.…”
Section: Figure 2(b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation