2018
DOI: 10.3390/vision2040044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Types of Visual Agnosia Using EEG

Abstract: Visual recognition deficits are the hallmark symptom of visual agnosia, a neuropsychological disorder typically associated with damage to the visual system. Most research into visual agnosia focuses on characterizing the deficits through detailed behavioral testing, and structural and functional brain scans are used to determine the spatial extent of any cortical damage. Although the hierarchical nature of the visual system leads to clear predictions about the temporal dynamics of cortical deficits, there has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are also consistent with studies showing that stroke-related prefrontal injury is often associated with increased amplitude and longer latencies for AEPs (Woods and Clayworth, 1986;Knight et al, 1989) and SEPs (Yamaguchi and Knight, 1990). This is in stark contrast with injury localized to temporal, parietal, or occipital regions, which are usually associated with decreased sensory-evoked response amplitude (Knight et al, 1980;Kileny et al, 1987;Woods et al, 1987;Alain et al, 1998;Haigh et al, 2018;Mammadkhanli et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings are also consistent with studies showing that stroke-related prefrontal injury is often associated with increased amplitude and longer latencies for AEPs (Woods and Clayworth, 1986;Knight et al, 1989) and SEPs (Yamaguchi and Knight, 1990). This is in stark contrast with injury localized to temporal, parietal, or occipital regions, which are usually associated with decreased sensory-evoked response amplitude (Knight et al, 1980;Kileny et al, 1987;Woods et al, 1987;Alain et al, 1998;Haigh et al, 2018;Mammadkhanli et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At the same time, neural decoding also lends itself well to single-participant analyses and can therefore provide insights into how visual representations are altered in cases of visual deficits (i.e., case studies). Various work has found neural correlates of representational differences in disorders such as prosopagnosia, a deficit in face recognition (Rivolta et al 2014), and visual object agnosia, a deficit in object recognition (Haigh et al 2018). There is almost endless possibility in this space, and future work will likely tackle in greater detail how representations vary during development, after brain injury, during healthy aging, and in clinical populations, among other circumstances.…”
Section: New Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%