2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-014-0324-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) of the Upper Midwest using PCR melt curve analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies have shown that P. leucopus and P. maniculatus may exhibit significant differences in external traits, measurement ranges often overlap and classification analyses based on external morphology analyses tend to perform moderately or poorly (Rich et al 1996;Kamler et al 1998;Lindquist et al 2003). Indeed, it often appears that reliable and accurate identification of either species requires detailed cranial measurements (Rich et al 1996), or molecular methods such as salivary amylase phenotyping (Aquadro and Patton 1980), and amplification of genetic markers (Tessier et al 2004;Ridenhour and Cramer 2015;Seifert et al 2016). The similarities in morphology, ecology, and life history traits suggest that potential hybridization between both species is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although several studies have shown that P. leucopus and P. maniculatus may exhibit significant differences in external traits, measurement ranges often overlap and classification analyses based on external morphology analyses tend to perform moderately or poorly (Rich et al 1996;Kamler et al 1998;Lindquist et al 2003). Indeed, it often appears that reliable and accurate identification of either species requires detailed cranial measurements (Rich et al 1996), or molecular methods such as salivary amylase phenotyping (Aquadro and Patton 1980), and amplification of genetic markers (Tessier et al 2004;Ridenhour and Cramer 2015;Seifert et al 2016). The similarities in morphology, ecology, and life history traits suggest that potential hybridization between both species is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method commonly used in recent studies to discriminate between the two Peromyscus species relies on amplification of the mitochondrial COIII marker (e.g., Tessier et al 2004;Ridenhour and Cramer 2015). As a mitochondrial marker, COIII is often employed in phylogenetic studies investigating evolutionary relationships among mammalian species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%