2010
DOI: 10.4236/ns.2010.26066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of wild boar and domestic pig populations based on the frequency of chromosomes carrying endogenous retroviruses

Abstract: Analysis of the frequencies of chromosomes carrying various classes of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) and combinations of these classes was performed in the swine species Sus scrofa L. by using maps constructed in two principal component coordinates. Four population clusters can be recognized in the maps. Cluster 1 is formed by wild boars,cluster 2 by domestic meat breeds, cluster 3 by meat-and-lard (universal) breeds, and cluster 4 by miniature pigs. The maps indicate that modern domesticated swine m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of PERV in domestic porcine breeds has shown that though the A and B types of PERV pre vail in the genomes of all the studied breeds, there are still often seen animals with no PERV of the C type (Bosh et al, 2000;Nikitin et al, 2008;Yudin et al, 2009;Aitnazarov et al, 2010;Nikitin et al, 2010). There are the differences between wild boars and domestic pigs, as well as between the wild boars of West Europe and Central Asia, in terms of the frequency of occurrence of individuals with chromosome carriers of PERV and their combinations (Jin et al, 2000;Nikitin et al, 2008;Aitnazarov et al, 2010).…”
Section: Molecular Genetic Characteristics Of Pervmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of PERV in domestic porcine breeds has shown that though the A and B types of PERV pre vail in the genomes of all the studied breeds, there are still often seen animals with no PERV of the C type (Bosh et al, 2000;Nikitin et al, 2008;Yudin et al, 2009;Aitnazarov et al, 2010;Nikitin et al, 2010). There are the differences between wild boars and domestic pigs, as well as between the wild boars of West Europe and Central Asia, in terms of the frequency of occurrence of individuals with chromosome carriers of PERV and their combinations (Jin et al, 2000;Nikitin et al, 2008;Aitnazarov et al, 2010).…”
Section: Molecular Genetic Characteristics Of Pervmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Statistical analysis of the frequencies of chromosome carriers of PERV types and their combinations shows that the microevolutionary processes related to the frequency of PERV carriage within populations of wild and domestic pigs of the S. scrofa species have two main vectors: varying the intensity of adipopexis and nega tive changes in the development of productive features (Yudin et al, 2009;Nikitin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Molecular Genetic Characteristics Of Pervmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The third reason is that creating new herds of laboratory mini-pigs from a small number of progenitors (see Table 1) creates a risk of depleting the gene pool due to the bottleneck effect (Ji et al, 2011). Interestingly, according to various estimates, the genetic diversity of laboratory pigs can be both greater and lower compared with similar parameters of pigs of factory breeds and wild boar (Nikitin et al, 2010;Heckel et al, 2015). Several publications mentioned the existence of natural "contr inbred" mechanisms in natural populations (Charlesworth, Willis, 2009; Cheptou, Donohue, 2011; Mable, 2019), which is indirectly confirmed by the existence of the short populations of feral pigs with no signs of inbreeding depression on small islands throughout the centuries (Köhn, 2011;McKenney-Drake et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Preservation Of Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the qualitative traits are mostly estimated as more simple because of a strong concordance of each specific genotype to a single phenotype according to the «one genotype-one phenotype» principle. For long time of our studying variations of qualitative traits the results of both practical and theoretical interest have been obtained (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Importantly, once the quantitative trait changes were first statistically analyzed, a number of genetic determinations peculiar specifically to domestic animals were found out (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%