Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Focal liver lesions are present in more than 5 % of the population and are often detected incidentally when an imaging study is performed for another reason. In 40 % of cases, it is not possible to categorize such incidental lesions adequately by imaging ( Strobel and Bernatik 2006 ). Liver lesions are especially challenging for the radiologist interpreting whole-body screening MRI studies, which typically only include non-contrast-enhanced pulse sequences. With unenhanced MR images, only a crude characterization of focal liver lesions is possible.In the screening situation, we can roughly distinguish three categories of focal liver lesions: benign cysts and cyst-like lesions, benign solid masses, and solid malignancies (Table 8.1 ). Lesions with a cystic appearance such as dysontogenetic cysts, echinococcal cysts, and cavernous hemangiomas can be diagnosed with confi dence on the basis of an unenhanced MRI examination (including conventional T1-and T2-weighted sequences), and treatment recommendations can be made accordingly. This is not the case for solid liver lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma, metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocellular carcinoma. In most instances, a contrast-enhanced study is necessary to characterize solid liver lesions and estimate their total extent.
Focal liver lesions are present in more than 5 % of the population and are often detected incidentally when an imaging study is performed for another reason. In 40 % of cases, it is not possible to categorize such incidental lesions adequately by imaging ( Strobel and Bernatik 2006 ). Liver lesions are especially challenging for the radiologist interpreting whole-body screening MRI studies, which typically only include non-contrast-enhanced pulse sequences. With unenhanced MR images, only a crude characterization of focal liver lesions is possible.In the screening situation, we can roughly distinguish three categories of focal liver lesions: benign cysts and cyst-like lesions, benign solid masses, and solid malignancies (Table 8.1 ). Lesions with a cystic appearance such as dysontogenetic cysts, echinococcal cysts, and cavernous hemangiomas can be diagnosed with confi dence on the basis of an unenhanced MRI examination (including conventional T1-and T2-weighted sequences), and treatment recommendations can be made accordingly. This is not the case for solid liver lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma, metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocellular carcinoma. In most instances, a contrast-enhanced study is necessary to characterize solid liver lesions and estimate their total extent.
The current availability of liver-specific contrast media (LSCM) allows the possibility to obtain an accurate diagnosis when studying focal liver lesions (FLL). It is necessary to have an in-depth knowledge of the biologic and histologic characteristics of FLL and the enhancement mechanism of LSCM to gain significant accuracy in the differential diagnosis of FLL. It is possible to subdivide FLL into three main groups according to the kinetics of contrast enhancement: hypervascular FLL, hypovascular FLL, and FLL with delayed enhancement. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is an important tool in the identification and characterization of FLL. LSCM with a first phase of extracellular distribution give both dynamic (morphologic) and late phase (functional) information useful for lesion characterization. With LSCM it is possible to differentiate with high accuracy benign from malignant lesions and hepatocellular from nonhepatocellular lesions. To understand contrast behavior after injection of LSCM, it is necessary to correlate contrast enhancement with the biologic and histologic findings of FLL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.