1974
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1974.1140803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction by a quarter plane, the exact solution, and some numerical results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In (7), the points and lie on face and , respectively, and both approach the integration point on edge (Fig. 2); such limit leads to a finite value despite the singular behavior of each of both terms in (7). The evaluation of implies the knowledge of the vector potential on the edges of the pyramid, which would require the knowledge of the unknown scattered field [see (3)].…”
Section: Scalar Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (7), the points and lie on face and , respectively, and both approach the integration point on edge (Fig. 2); such limit leads to a finite value despite the singular behavior of each of both terms in (7). The evaluation of implies the knowledge of the vector potential on the edges of the pyramid, which would require the knowledge of the unknown scattered field [see (3)].…”
Section: Scalar Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact solution of the scalar problem for soft boundary conditions and 90 plane angular sector was obtained by Radlow [5], who used the Wiener-Hopf technique; his work was recently extended to the electromagnetic case by Albertsen [6]. For arbitrary corner angle, the exact electromagnetic solution was first found by Satterwhite and Kouyoumjian [7], [8]; however, the series expansion representation of the solution is slowly convergent when the distance from the tip increases and no practical asymptotic approximation has been found yet. An alternative derivation of the same solution was given in [9]; in the works by Smyshlyaev [10], [11] the exact solution was obtained as a particular case of an elliptical degenerated cone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative derivation of the same solution was given in [9]; in the works by Smyshlyaev [10], [11] the exact solution was obtained as a particular case of an elliptical degenerated cone. The solution in [7], [8] was used in [12] to obtain an interpolation of the fringe currents in a region close to the tip after extracting the UTD dominant terms. In [13], a hybrid method of moments (MoM)-UTD procedure was applied to a square plate in order to derive approximate analytical expressions for the currents on a right-angled plane angular sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An even more serious impairment is encountered in applying GTD to RCS calculations, due to the fact that the leading edge contributions are restricted to lying on the pertinent diffraction cones. The canonical problem of the plane angular sector was solved by Satterwhite and Kouyoumjian [3,4], but the series expansion of the solution is hard to compute and not well-suited for a practical asymptotic evaluation. Most of the literature on this topic presents formulations based on numerical or hybrid techniques [5][6][7] or on approximate, high-frequency methods [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%