2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.155447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffractive arrays of gold nanoparticles near an interface: Critical role of the substrate

Abstract: The optical properties of periodic arrays of plasmonic nanoantennas are strongly affected by coherent multiple scattering in the plane of the array, which leads to sharp spectral resonances in both transmission and reflection when the wavelength is commensurate with the period. We demonstrate that the presence of a substrate ͑i.e., an asymmetric refractive-index environment͒ can inhibit long-range coupling between the particles and suppress lattice resonances, in agreement with recent experimental results. We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
208
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
10
208
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These lattice resonances originate from the radiative coupling between LSPRs, enhanced by diffracted orders in the plane of the array or by refractive index guided modes in the proximity of the array. In the former case the collective resonances are known as surface lattice resonances (SLRs) [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9], while the latter are known as waveguide-plasmon polaritons [10,11] or quasiguided modes [12], depending on the degree of coupling between the localized resonances and the waveguide modes. In contrast to LSPRs, collective resonances are characterized as being weakly confined to the nanoparticles, i.e., having a large extension into the surrounding media [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lattice resonances originate from the radiative coupling between LSPRs, enhanced by diffracted orders in the plane of the array or by refractive index guided modes in the proximity of the array. In the former case the collective resonances are known as surface lattice resonances (SLRs) [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9], while the latter are known as waveguide-plasmon polaritons [10,11] or quasiguided modes [12], depending on the degree of coupling between the localized resonances and the waveguide modes. In contrast to LSPRs, collective resonances are characterized as being weakly confined to the nanoparticles, i.e., having a large extension into the surrounding media [7,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam spot on the sample was reduced to a diameter of 30 µm by inserting a pinhole aperture between the light source and the condenser, thereby giving a beam divergence of less than 1 deg. The arrays were then index matched with oil (n = 1.515) [31,32] and the transmitted light collected with an oil immersion lens (NA of 1.25). A long-pass filter (cutoff 500 nm) was inserted in the optical path after the collection objective to remove higher diffracted orders.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is known that the resonance behavior of, for instance, plasmonic particles is influenced drastically in case of a dielectric interface being placed in close proximity (see for instance [16][17][18]). We now study the influence of the substrate material on the knife-edge profiling scheme in detail by performing knife-edge measurements for different detector and substrate materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%