2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00277-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion and catalytic cracking of 1,3,5 tri-iso-propyl-benzene in FCC catalysts

Abstract: The present study describes catalytic cracking experiments developed in a novel CREC Riser Simulator using 1,3,5-Tri-iso-propyl-benzene and two FCC catalysts with different crystal sizes (0.4-μm and 0.9-μm diameter). The experiments are modeled using an unsteady state model for both gas and catalyst phases. It is found that a quasi-steady state approximation can be used for the catalyst and changes in the gas phase can be accounted, under the allowed model simplifications, with a relatively simple unsteady sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the low olefinity obtained from MAT reactor, due to its higher reaction time (> 75 s) as compared to the riser (< 15 s), non uniform coke deposition (150 mm long catalyst bed), and temperature/concentration gradient, which are eliminated by the well-mixed characteristics and intense fluidization of the riser simulator. The riser simulator is fast becoming a valuable experimental tool for reaction evaluation involving model compounds [24,25] and also for testing and developing new fluidized catalytic cracking in vacuum gas oil cracking [26,27]. The riser simulator consists of two outer shells, the lower section and the upper section, which allow one to load or to unload the catalyst easily, as illustrated in Fig as well as intense gas mixing inside the reactor.…”
Section: The Riser Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the low olefinity obtained from MAT reactor, due to its higher reaction time (> 75 s) as compared to the riser (< 15 s), non uniform coke deposition (150 mm long catalyst bed), and temperature/concentration gradient, which are eliminated by the well-mixed characteristics and intense fluidization of the riser simulator. The riser simulator is fast becoming a valuable experimental tool for reaction evaluation involving model compounds [24,25] and also for testing and developing new fluidized catalytic cracking in vacuum gas oil cracking [26,27]. The riser simulator consists of two outer shells, the lower section and the upper section, which allow one to load or to unload the catalyst easily, as illustrated in Fig as well as intense gas mixing inside the reactor.…”
Section: The Riser Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resids have higher contents of contaminant metals, polynuclear aromatics, heteroatoms and complex macromolecular groups than standard hydrocarbon feedstocks [3], which are typically vacuum gas oils (VGO). This represents an important challenge for FCC technology, and improvements in the transport properties of the commercial catalysts would be attractive in order to improve the selectivity to desired products and decrease undesired secondary reactions [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one consists in synthesizing zeolites with extra-large pores [9] which, however, would show a different topology and low hydrothermal stability. The second one is based on the use of smaller Y zeolite crystal size, so as to increase the external specific surface area and decrease diffusion paths in the crystals [4,5,10]. A third possibility is the induction of intracrystalline mesopores, that is, cracks, cavities [11] and cylindrical channels [12] in the crystals in the mesopore size range, that are interconnected in a wormhole-like manner to each other [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding catalyst deactivation, as deactivation functions can be expressed in terms of the catalyst time-on-stream ( = exp(− )), deactivation can also be related to the progress of the reaction [45], where is a catalyst deactivation constant. The deactivation function based on time-on-stream was initially suggested by Voorhies [46].…”
Section: Catalytic Performance From the Odh Of Ethanementioning
confidence: 99%