1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.64.1274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion and isomer shift of interstitial iron in silicon observed via in-beam Mössbauer spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,[23][24][25] In 57 Mn→ 57 Fe experiments the intensity of the singlet substitutional center ͑c͒ continuously increases above 100 K and finally remains constant only above 180°C, [23][24][25] while in 57 Fe * studies it only appears above ϳ350°C. 17,20 This difference in temperature may be due to the fact that in 57 Fe * experiments these centers can definitely only be formed during the 140 ns lifetime, while in 57 Mn→ 57 Fe studies they may be formed already by the 57 Mn precursor and survive its decay. In 57 Mn→ 57 Fe experiments above 100°C the "new line" ͑d͒ starts to appear which persists even at 500°C.…”
Section: Comparison With Mössbauer and Epr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21,[23][24][25] In 57 Mn→ 57 Fe experiments the intensity of the singlet substitutional center ͑c͒ continuously increases above 100 K and finally remains constant only above 180°C, [23][24][25] while in 57 Fe * studies it only appears above ϳ350°C. 17,20 This difference in temperature may be due to the fact that in 57 Fe * experiments these centers can definitely only be formed during the 140 ns lifetime, while in 57 Mn→ 57 Fe studies they may be formed already by the 57 Mn precursor and survive its decay. In 57 Mn→ 57 Fe experiments above 100°C the "new line" ͑d͒ starts to appear which persists even at 500°C.…”
Section: Comparison With Mössbauer and Epr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general picture which has emerged from these studies is that Fe in Si produces four characteristic Mössbauer signals: ͑a͒ a quadrupole-split doublet with ␦ = + 0.20-0.33 mm/ s and E Q = 0.83-1.0 mm/ s ͑at 300 K͒ which results from Fe in a damaged environment 17,[20][21][22][23][24][25] and is sometimes also termed the "amorphous" site; 26 ͑b͒ a singlet of isomer shift ␦ = + 0.76-0.86 mm/ s ͑at 300 K͒ which is without doubt due to interstitial Fe; 17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] ͑c͒ a second singlet with ␦ = −͑0.08-0.03͒ mm/ s ͑extrapolated to 0 K͒ which originates from substitutional Fe; 17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] ͑d͒ a second doublet with ␦ = + 0.44-0.51 mm/ s and E Q = 0.6 mm/ s ͑extrapolated to 0 K͒, which has been termed the "unknown" 21 or "new" line 22,24 and is attributed to Fe on interstitial sites paired with a vacancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, diffusivity of isolated Fe impurities in a-Si in a similar temperature range has been found to be several orders of magnitude higher. 10 This wide variation in Fe diffusivity in a-Si points out to different mechanisms of diffusion in the three cases. Fe isolated impurities in Si are known to occupy interstitial positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstitial Fe is known to exist in two charge states and other methods had been unable to pin down the dependence of the diffusivity of the well-known Fe +/0 charge states for the donor level which is at 0.38 eV above the valance band [17]. MS had measured the diffusivity of interstitial 57 Fe i which had been determined by in-beam experiments by the line broadening caused by diffusional jumps during the lifetime of the Mössbauer state [19]. Gunnlaugsson et al noticed that at temperatures above 500 K there was a clear broadening visible in the lines attributed to Fe i [20], which was attributed to the diffusion of Fe during the Mössbauer lifetime.…”
Section: Representative Results From Msmentioning
confidence: 99%