1990
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.66-69.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion and Isotope Effects for Diffusion in Transition Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental results are difficult to obtain because of the reactivity of W at high diffusion temperatures, and different investigators report widely varying results. [28,42] Also, Klotsman et al [28] use a value of 596.7 kJ/mole for the self-diffusion of W in W as opposed to the calculated value of 560.1 kJ/mole used here. [28,42] Also, Klotsman et al [28] use a value of 596.7 kJ/mole for the self-diffusion of W in W as opposed to the calculated value of 560.1 kJ/mole used here.…”
Section: Diffusion In Tungstenmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimental results are difficult to obtain because of the reactivity of W at high diffusion temperatures, and different investigators report widely varying results. [28,42] Also, Klotsman et al [28] use a value of 596.7 kJ/mole for the self-diffusion of W in W as opposed to the calculated value of 560.1 kJ/mole used here. [28,42] Also, Klotsman et al [28] use a value of 596.7 kJ/mole for the self-diffusion of W in W as opposed to the calculated value of 560.1 kJ/mole used here.…”
Section: Diffusion In Tungstenmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Klotsman, [28] in attempting to rationalize diffusion of solute impurities in Ni, used effective relative valences ranging from Ϫ6 for Ti to ϩ6 for S, based on atomic magnetic moments. Besides the size problem of ions with a relative charge of Ϫ6, a long extrapolation of the curve for ⌬H 2 ϩ ⌬E in Figure 17 shows that the activation energy for diffusion of Ti in Ni would be enormous when, in fact, the experimental value is lower than that for the self-diffusion of Ni.…”
Section: G Diffusion In Nickelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6], ⌬Q S is the difference in enthalpies for a vacancysolute atom exchange, , and a vacancy-solvent atom ex-S H 2 change, , plus the difference in enthalpies to form a S H 0 vacancy next to a solute atom, , and that required to form S E 2 a vacancy in the pure solvent, , minus a constant, C S , S E 0 which takes into consideration the possible temperature variation of the solute correlation factor, , which may not be S f 2 a purely geometric factor as is the case for solvent selfdiffusion:…”
Section: A Activation Energymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…''It has become a habitual notion that the diffusion behaviour in normal metals is well described in terms of the simple and physically lucid Lazarus-LeClaire model.'' [6] The LazarusLeClaire model is sound in principle and widely accepted, despite the fact that it only works well for the diffusion of electropositive solutes in the noble metals. The diffusion of electronegative solutes is not described well by the theory, and attempts to apply the theory to other solvent metals, such as Al, ␣-Fe, and ␥ -Fe, have been largely unsuccessful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hole theory ignores the energy needed for a diffusing atom to enter a hole. 2,3 Applications of the hole theory [4][5][6][7] have worked well for diffusion of electropositive solutes in noble metals, but not for electronegative solutes. Data for diffusion in metals are important from both practical and theoretical viewpoints.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%